From: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org
Cc: ctalbott-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
rni-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:11:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Currently, blkg_lookup() doesn't check @q bypass state. This patch
updates blk_queue_bypass_start() to do synchronize_rcu() before
returning and updates blkg_lookup() to check blk_queue_bypass() and
return %NULL if bypassing. This ensures blkg_lookup() returns %NULL
if @q is bypassing.
This is to guarantee that nobody is accessing policy data while @q is
bypassing, which is necessary to allow replacing blkio_cgroup->pd[] in
place on policy [de]activation.
v2: Added more comments explaining bypass guarantees as suggested by
Vivek.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
block/blk-core.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index f6581a0..d6e4555 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -137,6 +137,38 @@ static struct blkio_group *blkg_alloc(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
return blkg;
}
+static struct blkio_group *__blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ struct blkio_group *blkg;
+ struct hlist_node *n;
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
+ if (blkg->q == q)
+ return blkg;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * blkg_lookup - lookup blkg for the specified blkcg - q pair
+ * @blkcg: blkcg of interest
+ * @q: request_queue of interest
+ *
+ * Lookup blkg for the @blkcg - @q pair. This function should be called
+ * under RCU read lock and is guaranteed to return %NULL if @q is bypassing
+ * - see blk_queue_bypass_start() for details.
+ */
+struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)))
+ return NULL;
+ return __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
+
struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
struct request_queue *q,
bool for_root)
@@ -150,13 +182,11 @@ struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
/*
* This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation and
* we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing queue.
- * The following can be removed if blkg lookup is guaranteed to
- * fail on a bypassing queue.
*/
if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)) && !for_root)
return ERR_PTR(blk_queue_dead(q) ? -EINVAL : -EBUSY);
- blkg = blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
+ blkg = __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
if (blkg)
return blkg;
@@ -185,20 +215,6 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup_create);
-/* called under rcu_read_lock(). */
-struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
- struct request_queue *q)
-{
- struct blkio_group *blkg;
- struct hlist_node *n;
-
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
- if (blkg->q == q)
- return blkg;
- return NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
-
static void blkg_destroy(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
struct request_queue *q = blkg->q;
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 991c1d6..a4b3eaf 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
* In bypass mode, only the dispatch FIFO queue of @q is used. This
* function makes @q enter bypass mode and drains all requests which were
* throttled or issued before. On return, it's guaranteed that no request
- * is being throttled or has ELVPRIV set.
+ * is being throttled or has ELVPRIV set and blk_queue_bypass() %true
+ * inside queue or RCU read lock.
*/
void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q)
{
@@ -426,6 +427,8 @@ void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q)
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
blk_drain_queue(q, false);
+ /* ensure blk_queue_bypass() is %true inside RCU read lock */
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_bypass_start);
--
1.7.7.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:11:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Currently, blkg_lookup() doesn't check @q bypass state. This patch
updates blk_queue_bypass_start() to do synchronize_rcu() before
returning and updates blkg_lookup() to check blk_queue_bypass() and
return %NULL if bypassing. This ensures blkg_lookup() returns %NULL
if @q is bypassing.
This is to guarantee that nobody is accessing policy data while @q is
bypassing, which is necessary to allow replacing blkio_cgroup->pd[] in
place on policy [de]activation.
v2: Added more comments explaining bypass guarantees as suggested by
Vivek.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
block/blk-core.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index f6581a0..d6e4555 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -137,6 +137,38 @@ static struct blkio_group *blkg_alloc(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
return blkg;
}
+static struct blkio_group *__blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ struct blkio_group *blkg;
+ struct hlist_node *n;
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
+ if (blkg->q == q)
+ return blkg;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * blkg_lookup - lookup blkg for the specified blkcg - q pair
+ * @blkcg: blkcg of interest
+ * @q: request_queue of interest
+ *
+ * Lookup blkg for the @blkcg - @q pair. This function should be called
+ * under RCU read lock and is guaranteed to return %NULL if @q is bypassing
+ * - see blk_queue_bypass_start() for details.
+ */
+struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
+ struct request_queue *q)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)))
+ return NULL;
+ return __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
+
struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
struct request_queue *q,
bool for_root)
@@ -150,13 +182,11 @@ struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup_create(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
/*
* This could be the first entry point of blkcg implementation and
* we shouldn't allow anything to go through for a bypassing queue.
- * The following can be removed if blkg lookup is guaranteed to
- * fail on a bypassing queue.
*/
if (unlikely(blk_queue_bypass(q)) && !for_root)
return ERR_PTR(blk_queue_dead(q) ? -EINVAL : -EBUSY);
- blkg = blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
+ blkg = __blkg_lookup(blkcg, q);
if (blkg)
return blkg;
@@ -185,20 +215,6 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup_create);
-/* called under rcu_read_lock(). */
-struct blkio_group *blkg_lookup(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
- struct request_queue *q)
-{
- struct blkio_group *blkg;
- struct hlist_node *n;
-
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node)
- if (blkg->q == q)
- return blkg;
- return NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_lookup);
-
static void blkg_destroy(struct blkio_group *blkg)
{
struct request_queue *q = blkg->q;
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 991c1d6..a4b3eaf 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
* In bypass mode, only the dispatch FIFO queue of @q is used. This
* function makes @q enter bypass mode and drains all requests which were
* throttled or issued before. On return, it's guaranteed that no request
- * is being throttled or has ELVPRIV set.
+ * is being throttled or has ELVPRIV set and blk_queue_bypass() %true
+ * inside queue or RCU read lock.
*/
void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q)
{
@@ -426,6 +427,8 @@ void blk_queue_bypass_start(struct request_queue *q)
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
blk_drain_queue(q, false);
+ /* ensure blk_queue_bypass() is %true inside RCU read lock */
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_bypass_start);
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 20:11 [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1334347895-6268-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] cfq: fix build breakage & warnings Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] blkcg: kill blkio_list and replace blkio_list_lock with a mutex Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] blkcg: use @pol instead of @plid in update_root_blkg_pd() and blkcg_print_blkgs() Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] blkcg: remove static policy ID enums Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] blkcg: make blkg_conf_prep() take @pol and return with queue lock held Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] blkcg: make sure blkg_lookup() returns %NULL if @q is bypassing Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:50 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:50 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:50 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] blkcg: make request_queue bypassing on allocation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1334347895-6268-8-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413203205.GI26383-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413203726.GE12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:44 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413204446.GK26383-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:47 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413204710.GF12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 20:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:55 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413205501.GL26383-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413210548.GG12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413211640.GH12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 12:04 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-17 12:04 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-17 12:04 ` James Bottomley
2012-04-18 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20120413213344.GA1825-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-13 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120413213852.GJ12233-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-16 12:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-16 12:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] blkcg: add request_queue->root_blkg Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] blkcg: implement per-queue policy activation Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] blkcg: drop stuff unused after per-queue policy activation update Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] blkcg: shoot down blkgs if all policies are deactivated Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 8:09 ` [PATCHSET] block: per-queue policy activation, take#2 Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 8:09 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20120420080943.GG7505-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 12:02 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 12:02 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <4F91503D.2060402-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20120420171742.GC32324-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <4F91B433.2070209-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-25 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-25 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-20 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
2012-04-20 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] blkcg: make blkg_conf_prep() take @pol and return with queue lock held Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] blkcg: add request_queue->root_blkg Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] blkcg: drop stuff unused after per-queue policy activation update Tejun Heo
2012-04-13 20:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] blkcg: shoot down blkgs if all policies are deactivated Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334347895-6268-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ctalbott-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rni-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.