From: chf.fritz@googlemail.com (Christoph Fritz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:49:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337276960.4970.4.camel@lovely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120509081306.GK27341@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:13 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:56:18AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:22:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the mx35 to the supported cpu-families of the
> > > > "CPUfreq driver for i.MX CPUs".
> > >
> > > I'm afraid this has to wait another cycle since you are patching a file
> > > that is scheduled to be replaced with common clock framework support.
> >
> > Has this "scheduled replacement" somewhere (e.g. calendar) been
> > marked? So that I can check in the future before editing "scheduled
> > files".
>
> The clock framework conversion has been a hot topic for quite a while
> now, but there hasn't been an official note about it outside the list.
> I can understand that the occasional linux arm kernel reader is not
> aware of it, but we currently have nothing in place to anounce such
> things. (Other than feature-removal.txt which seems not very suitable
> since no feature is removed, only updated)
Is there already a version I can rebase the patch?
On your repo at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git I can't
find the new clock framework or even a work-in-progress version.
Thanks,
-- Christoph
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:49:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337276960.4970.4.camel@lovely> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120509081306.GK27341@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:13 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:56:18AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:22:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the mx35 to the supported cpu-families of the
> > > > "CPUfreq driver for i.MX CPUs".
> > >
> > > I'm afraid this has to wait another cycle since you are patching a file
> > > that is scheduled to be replaced with common clock framework support.
> >
> > Has this "scheduled replacement" somewhere (e.g. calendar) been
> > marked? So that I can check in the future before editing "scheduled
> > files".
>
> The clock framework conversion has been a hot topic for quite a while
> now, but there hasn't been an official note about it outside the list.
> I can understand that the occasional linux arm kernel reader is not
> aware of it, but we currently have nothing in place to anounce such
> things. (Other than feature-removal.txt which seems not very suitable
> since no feature is removed, only updated)
Is there already a version I can rebase the patch?
On your repo at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git I can't
find the new clock framework or even a work-in-progress version.
Thanks,
-- Christoph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-07 14:14 [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support Christoph Fritz
2012-05-07 14:14 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-09 7:22 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-09 7:22 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-09 7:56 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-09 7:56 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-09 8:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-09 8:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-17 17:49 ` Christoph Fritz [this message]
2012-05-17 17:49 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-17 18:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-17 18:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-17 18:40 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-17 18:40 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-17 22:42 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-17 22:42 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-27 18:20 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-27 18:20 ` Christoph Fritz
2012-05-29 14:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-29 14:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-18 5:05 ` Marc Reilly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337276960.4970.4.camel@lovely \
--to=chf.fritz@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.