From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] nfsd4: clarify that renewing expired client is a bug
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:40:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337809240-15770-11-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337809240-15770-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
This can't happen:
- cl_time is zeroed only by unhash_client_locked, which is only
ever called under both the state lock and the client lock.
- every caller of renew_client() should have looked up a
(non-expired) client and then called renew_client() all
without dropping the state lock.
- the only other caller of renew_client_locked() is
release_session_client(), which first checks under the
client_lock that the cl_time is nonzero.
So make it clear that this is a bug, not something we handle. I can't
quite bring myself to make this a BUG(), though, as there are a lot of
renew_client() callers, and returning here is probably safer than a
BUG().
We'll consider making it a BUG() after some more cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 72bc277..be1fc97 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -1022,7 +1022,8 @@ static inline void
renew_client_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp)
{
if (is_client_expired(clp)) {
- dprintk("%s: client (clientid %08x/%08x) already expired\n",
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ printk("%s: client (clientid %08x/%08x) already expired\n",
__func__,
clp->cl_clientid.cl_boot,
clp->cl_clientid.cl_id);
--
1.7.9.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-23 21:40 mainly setclientid/confirm cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] nfsd4: setclientid remove unnecessary terms from a logical expression J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 02/10] nfsd4: setclientid/confirm comment cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfsd4: merge last two setclientid cases J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] nfsd4: pull out common code from " J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfsd4: merge 3 setclientid cases to 2 J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] nfsd4: fix setclientid_confirm same_cred check J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] nfsd4: fix error return in non-matching-creds case J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] nfsd4: setclientid: remove pointless assignment J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] nfsd4: simpler ordering of setclientid_confirm checks J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337809240-15770-11-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.