From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] nfsd4: setclientid/confirm comment cleanup
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:40:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337809240-15770-3-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337809240-15770-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Be a little more concise.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 67 +++++++++------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 3dc0289..4ce1045 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -2169,17 +2169,13 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
if (status)
return status;
- /*
- * XXX The Duplicate Request Cache (DRC) has been checked (??)
- * We get here on a DRC miss.
- */
-
strhashval = clientstr_hashval(dname);
+ /* Cases below refer to rfc 3530 section 14.2.33: */
nfs4_lock_state();
conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval);
if (conf) {
- /* RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 0: */
+ /* case 0: */
status = nfserr_clid_inuse;
if (clp_used_exchangeid(conf))
goto out;
@@ -2192,18 +2188,10 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
goto out;
}
}
- /*
- * section 14.2.33 of RFC 3530 (under the heading "IMPLEMENTATION")
- * has a description of SETCLIENTID request processing consisting
- * of 5 bullet points, labeled as CASE0 - CASE4 below.
- */
unconf = find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval);
status = nfserr_jukebox;
if (!conf) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 4:
- * placed first, because it is the normal case
- */
+ /* case 4: placed first, because it's the normal case */
if (unconf)
expire_client(unconf);
new = create_client(clname, dname, rqstp, &clverifier);
@@ -2211,10 +2199,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
goto out;
gen_clid(new);
} else if (same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &clverifier)) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 1:
- * probable callback update
- */
+ /* case 1: probable callback update */
if (unconf) {
/* Note this is removing unconfirmed {*x***},
* which is stronger than RFC recommended {vxc**}.
@@ -2228,21 +2213,13 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
goto out;
copy_clid(new, conf);
} else if (!unconf) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 2:
- * probable client reboot; state will be removed if
- * confirmed.
- */
+ /* case 2: probable client reboot: */
new = create_client(clname, dname, rqstp, &clverifier);
if (new == NULL)
goto out;
gen_clid(new);
} else {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 3:
- * probable client reboot; state will be removed if
- * confirmed.
- */
+ /* case 3: probable client reboot: */
expire_client(unconf);
new = create_client(clname, dname, rqstp, &clverifier);
if (new == NULL)
@@ -2266,11 +2243,6 @@ out:
}
-/*
- * Section 14.2.34 of RFC 3530 (under the heading "IMPLEMENTATION") has
- * a description of SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM request processing consisting of 4
- * bullets, labeled as CASE1 - CASE4 below.
- */
__be32
nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
@@ -2293,17 +2265,10 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
conf = find_confirmed_client(clid);
unconf = find_unconfirmed_client(clid);
- /*
- * section 14.2.34 of RFC 3530 has a description of
- * SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM request processing consisting
- * of 4 bullet points, labeled as CASE1 - CASE4 below.
- */
+ /* cases below refer to rfc 3530 section 14.2.34: */
status = nfserr_clid_inuse;
if (conf && unconf && same_verf(&confirm, &unconf->cl_confirm)) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 1:
- * callback update
- */
+ /* case 1: callback update */
if (!same_creds(&conf->cl_cred, &unconf->cl_cred))
status = nfserr_clid_inuse;
else {
@@ -2313,21 +2278,14 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
status = nfs_ok;
}
} else if (conf && !unconf) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 2:
- * probable retransmitted request; play it safe and
- * do nothing.
- */
+ /* case 2: probable retransmit: */
if (!same_creds(&conf->cl_cred, &rqstp->rq_cred))
status = nfserr_clid_inuse;
else
status = nfs_ok;
} else if (!conf && unconf
&& same_verf(&unconf->cl_confirm, &confirm)) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 3:
- * Normal case; new or rebooted client:
- */
+ /* case 3: normal case; new or rebooted client */
if (!same_creds(&unconf->cl_cred, &rqstp->rq_cred)) {
status = nfserr_clid_inuse;
} else {
@@ -2346,10 +2304,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
}
} else if ((!conf || !same_verf(&conf->cl_confirm, &confirm))
&& (!unconf || !same_verf(&unconf->cl_confirm, &confirm))) {
- /*
- * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 4:
- * Client probably hasn't noticed that we rebooted yet.
- */
+ /* case 4: client hasn't noticed we rebooted yet? */
status = nfserr_stale_clientid;
}
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-23 21:40 mainly setclientid/confirm cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] nfsd4: setclientid remove unnecessary terms from a logical expression J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] nfsd4: merge last two setclientid cases J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] nfsd4: pull out common code from " J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfsd4: merge 3 setclientid cases to 2 J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] nfsd4: fix setclientid_confirm same_cred check J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] nfsd4: fix error return in non-matching-creds case J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] nfsd4: setclientid: remove pointless assignment J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] nfsd4: simpler ordering of setclientid_confirm checks J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-23 21:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] nfsd4: clarify that renewing expired client is a bug J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337809240-15770-3-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.