From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists()
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340380427.18025.84.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340217996-2254-5-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 20:46 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> It might be of interest which perfctr msr failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index bb340dc..8d29a35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void release_pmc_hardware(void) {}
>
> static bool check_hw_exists(void)
> {
> - u64 val, val_new = 0;
> + u64 val, val_new = ~0;
> int i, reg, ret = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ bios_fail:
>
> msr_fail:
> printk(KERN_CONT "Broken PMU hardware detected, using software events only.\n");
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to access perfctr msr (MSR %x is %Lx)\n", reg, val_new);
>
> return false;
> }
My gcc wants me to add the below to avoid used uninitialized warns:
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -211,8 +211,9 @@ static bool check_hw_exists(void)
* that don't trap on the MSR access and always return 0s.
*/
val = 0xabcdUL;
- ret = wrmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), val);
- ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), &val_new);
+ reg = x86_pmu_event_addr(0);
+ ret = wrmsrl_safe(reg, val);
+ ret |= rdmsrl_safe(reg, &val_new);
if (ret || val != val_new)
goto msr_fail;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-22 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 18:46 [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Updates and cleanups Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Rename Intel specific macros Robert Richter
2012-07-06 6:25 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Move Intel specific code to intel_pmu_init() Robert Richter
2012-07-06 6:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf, amd: Unify AMD's generic and family 15h pmus Robert Richter
2012-07-06 6:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/amd: Unify AMD' s " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists() Robert Richter
2012-06-22 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-22 16:36 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-27 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-06 6:27 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists( ) tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 20:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Updates and cleanups Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340380427.18025.84.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.