All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists()
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:36:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120622163643.GK24632@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340380427.18025.84.camel@twins>

On 22.06.12 17:53:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> My gcc wants me to add the below to avoid used uninitialized warns:
> 
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -211,8 +211,9 @@ static bool check_hw_exists(void)
>  	 * that don't trap on the MSR access and always return 0s.
>  	 */
>  	val = 0xabcdUL;
> -	ret = wrmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), val);
> -	ret |= rdmsrl_safe(x86_pmu_event_addr(0), &val_new);
> +	reg = x86_pmu_event_addr(0);
> +	ret = wrmsrl_safe(reg, val);
> +	ret |= rdmsrl_safe(reg, &val_new);

Yes, this is correct. It fixes also correct reporting of reg if it
fails here.

I wonder why my gcc this didn't report, its 4.4.5.

Thanks,

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-22 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 18:46 [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Updates and cleanups Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Rename Intel specific macros Robert Richter
2012-07-06  6:25   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Move Intel specific code to intel_pmu_init() Robert Richter
2012-07-06  6:26   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf, amd: Unify AMD's generic and family 15h pmus Robert Richter
2012-07-06  6:26   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/amd: Unify AMD' s " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists() Robert Richter
2012-06-22 15:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-22 16:36     ` Robert Richter [this message]
2012-06-27  9:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-06  6:27   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists( ) tip-bot for Robert Richter
2012-06-20 20:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf, x86: Updates and cleanups Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120622163643.GK24632@erda.amd.com \
    --to=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.