From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: mythripk@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, andy.green@linaro.org,
n-dechesne@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Check if RPM enabled before trying to change state
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:41:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340865706.2090.27.camel@lappyti> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJe_ZhdOiv8NgMB37h5_X_reK+urxVykW1tHDF9S50VVUvX=4g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1934 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 20:23 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 13:43, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't like it at all that omapdss disables and enables the panels in
> > omapdss's suspend/resume hooks. But I'm not sure how this should work...
> > Should panel drivers each have their own suspend/resume hooks, and
> > handle it themselves? Or should the call to suspend/resume come from
> > upper layers, like omapfb or omapdrm.
> >
> > I made a prototype patch a few weeks ago to move the suspend to omapfb,
> > and it feels better than the current one, but I'm still not sure...
> >
> IIUC, I have similar opinion.
> Each panel having its own suspend/resume sounds like inter-dependency trouble.
What do you mean with that? If we just consider omapdss and the panel
drivers, I see no dependency trouble. Panels are independent of each
other, and omapdss is supposed to handle any locking & refcounting
related to multiple panels already, as from omapdss's point of view
panel suspend is the same as panel disable.
And if we take omapfb/omapdrm into equation, well, in any case it
couldn't be any worse than the current one where suspend is handled by
omapdss.
> I too would prefer suspend/resume propagating from omap-fb/drm, which
> imho fits better with the notion of a linux device(omapdss is only
> backend). Though I don't have strong feelings about how core then take
> various panels up/down optimally.
One one hand, I see the combination of omapdss (or the "output" side of
omapdss) and a panel as a whole entity. I mean, if you just load omapdss
and a panel driver, but no omapfb/omapdrm, you already have a working
panel. You don't _need_ omapfb/omapdrm there. And in that sense it'd
make sense if the panels did handle their own suspend/resume.
But then, in real life it may be just simpler if omapfb/omapdrm handles
the suspend.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: mythripk@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, andy.green@linaro.org,
n-dechesne@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Check if RPM enabled before trying to change state
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:41:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340865706.2090.27.camel@lappyti> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJe_ZhdOiv8NgMB37h5_X_reK+urxVykW1tHDF9S50VVUvX=4g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1934 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 20:23 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 27 June 2012 13:43, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't like it at all that omapdss disables and enables the panels in
> > omapdss's suspend/resume hooks. But I'm not sure how this should work...
> > Should panel drivers each have their own suspend/resume hooks, and
> > handle it themselves? Or should the call to suspend/resume come from
> > upper layers, like omapfb or omapdrm.
> >
> > I made a prototype patch a few weeks ago to move the suspend to omapfb,
> > and it feels better than the current one, but I'm still not sure...
> >
> IIUC, I have similar opinion.
> Each panel having its own suspend/resume sounds like inter-dependency trouble.
What do you mean with that? If we just consider omapdss and the panel
drivers, I see no dependency trouble. Panels are independent of each
other, and omapdss is supposed to handle any locking & refcounting
related to multiple panels already, as from omapdss's point of view
panel suspend is the same as panel disable.
And if we take omapfb/omapdrm into equation, well, in any case it
couldn't be any worse than the current one where suspend is handled by
omapdss.
> I too would prefer suspend/resume propagating from omap-fb/drm, which
> imho fits better with the notion of a linux device(omapdss is only
> backend). Though I don't have strong feelings about how core then take
> various panels up/down optimally.
One one hand, I see the combination of omapdss (or the "output" side of
omapdss) and a panel as a whole entity. I mean, if you just load omapdss
and a panel driver, but no omapfb/omapdrm, you already have a working
panel. You don't _need_ omapfb/omapdrm there. And in that sense it'd
make sense if the panels did handle their own suspend/resume.
But then, in real life it may be just simpler if omapfb/omapdrm handles
the suspend.
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-28 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-23 8:06 [PATCH] OMAPDSS: Check if RPM enabled before trying to change state jaswinder.singh
2012-06-23 8:18 ` jaswinder.singh
2012-06-25 6:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 6:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 8:49 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 8:53 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 9:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 9:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:27 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 12:39 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 12:41 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:41 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 13:31 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 13:43 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 13:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 13:49 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 17:06 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 17:18 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 7:19 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 7:19 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 8:32 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 8:44 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 8:40 ` Andy Green
2012-06-26 8:40 ` Andy Green
2012-06-26 9:07 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 9:07 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 9:57 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 10:09 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 12:03 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 12:03 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 14:49 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 14:52 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 15:08 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:08 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:09 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 15:21 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 15:11 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:11 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 17:01 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 17:13 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-26 18:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 18:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27 4:42 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27 4:54 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27 5:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27 5:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27 7:41 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27 7:53 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27 8:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27 8:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-27 14:53 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-27 14:56 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-28 6:41 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-06-28 6:41 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-28 7:46 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-28 7:58 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-28 7:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-28 7:58 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:05 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-06-25 12:05 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-06-25 12:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:42 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-25 12:54 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-25 12:50 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-25 12:50 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 4:51 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-26 4:55 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-26 13:02 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-06-26 13:02 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-06-26 14:34 ` Alan Stern
2012-06-26 14:34 ` Alan Stern
2012-06-26 15:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-06-26 15:11 ` Alan Stern
2012-06-26 15:11 ` Alan Stern
2012-06-25 12:33 ` Jassi Brar
2012-06-25 12:45 ` Jassi Brar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340865706.2090.27.camel@lappyti \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=andy.green@linaro.org \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mythripk@ti.com \
--cc=n-dechesne@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.