All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3 v3] mm: bug fix free page check in zone_watermark_ok
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:50:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342061449-29590-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342061449-29590-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>

In __zone_watermark_ok, free and min are signed long type
while z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx] is unsigned long type.
So comparision of them could be wrong due to type conversion
to unsigned although free_pages is minus value.

It could return true instead of false in case of order-0 check
so that kswapd could sleep forever. It means livelock because
direct reclaimer loops forever until kswapd set
zone->all_unreclaimable.

Aaditya reported this problem when he test my hotplug patch.

Reported-off-by: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>
Tested-by: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
This patch isn't dependent with this series.
It seems to be candidate for -stable but I'm not sure because of this part.
So, pass the decision to akpm.

" - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
   problem..." type thing)."

 mm/page_alloc.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f17e6e4..627653c 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, int order, unsigned long mark,
 {
 	/* free_pages my go negative - that's OK */
 	long min = mark;
+	long lowmem_reserve = z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx];
 	int o;
 
 	free_pages -= (1 << order) - 1;
@@ -1602,7 +1603,7 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, int order, unsigned long mark,
 	if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER)
 		min -= min / 4;
 
-	if (free_pages <= min + z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx])
+	if (free_pages <= min + lowmem_reserve)
 		return false;
 	for (o = 0; o < order; o++) {
 		/* At the next order, this order's pages become unavailable */
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3 v3] mm: bug fix free page check in zone_watermark_ok
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:50:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342061449-29590-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342061449-29590-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>

In __zone_watermark_ok, free and min are signed long type
while z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx] is unsigned long type.
So comparision of them could be wrong due to type conversion
to unsigned although free_pages is minus value.

It could return true instead of false in case of order-0 check
so that kswapd could sleep forever. It means livelock because
direct reclaimer loops forever until kswapd set
zone->all_unreclaimable.

Aaditya reported this problem when he test my hotplug patch.

Reported-off-by: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>
Tested-by: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
This patch isn't dependent with this series.
It seems to be candidate for -stable but I'm not sure because of this part.
So, pass the decision to akpm.

" - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
   problem..." type thing)."

 mm/page_alloc.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f17e6e4..627653c 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, int order, unsigned long mark,
 {
 	/* free_pages my go negative - that's OK */
 	long min = mark;
+	long lowmem_reserve = z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx];
 	int o;
 
 	free_pages -= (1 << order) - 1;
@@ -1602,7 +1603,7 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, int order, unsigned long mark,
 	if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER)
 		min -= min / 4;
 
-	if (free_pages <= min + z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx])
+	if (free_pages <= min + lowmem_reserve)
 		return false;
 	for (o = 0; o < order; o++) {
 		/* At the next order, this order's pages become unavailable */
-- 
1.7.9.5


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12  2:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-12  2:50 [PATCH 1/3 v3] mm: Factor out memory isolate functions Minchan Kim
2012-07-12  2:50 ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-12  2:50 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-07-12  2:50   ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] mm: bug fix free page check in zone_watermark_ok Minchan Kim
2012-07-12  8:19   ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12  8:19     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12  9:05     ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-12  9:05       ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-12 10:16       ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 10:16         ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12  2:50 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] memory-hotplug: fix kswapd looping forever problem Minchan Kim
2012-07-12  2:50   ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-12 21:01   ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-12 21:01     ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-13  0:57     ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-13  0:57       ` Minchan Kim
2012-07-19 10:09     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-19 10:09       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342061449-29590-2-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=aaditya.kumar@ap.sony.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.