From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Alex Kelly <eshink@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>,
Dan Ballard <dan@mindstab.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:22:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342149765.31095.9.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH08tp_5CNnK68G4BpZ+d_V9OMwEt8hC_pbtNovgSCTnGYd0hg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:22 -0700, Alex Kelly wrote:
> Sorry it took me so long to reply to this:
>
> 1. *Should* I change the option to CONFIG_CORE_DUMP ? I agree with Josh
> that in terms of the existing codebase, either way makes sense, but I'll
> defer to your judgment if you think I should change it.
Yeah, I agree.
>
> 2. Is there a particular maintainer I should send this to if I hope to get
> it pushed upstream?
>
I think Andrew Morton will take the patch.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-13 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 0:38 [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file Alex Kelly
2012-07-03 0:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Alex Kelly
2012-07-03 4:55 ` Cong Wang
2012-07-03 5:09 ` Josh Triplett
[not found] ` <CAH08tp_5CNnK68G4BpZ+d_V9OMwEt8hC_pbtNovgSCTnGYd0hg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-13 3:22 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-07-03 4:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file Cong Wang
2012-07-13 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-01 2:23 Alex Kelly
2012-08-01 2:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Alex Kelly
2012-08-03 21:03 [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file Alex Kelly
2012-08-03 21:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional Alex Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342149765.31095.9.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan@mindstab.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eshink@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.