All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:56:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343656610.1513.14.camel@kyv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341389164-24409-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 770 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:05 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> The existing mechanism of reserving PEBs for bad PEB handling has two
> flaws:
> - It is calculated as a percentage of good PEBs instead of total PEBs.
> - There's no limit on the amount of PEBs UBI reserves for future bad
>   eraseblock handling.
> 
> This patchset changes the mechanism to overcome these flaws.

Hi Shmulik, I've separated out the defconfig changes and pushed patches
1,2, and 3 to the UBI tree (the master branch). Patches 4 and 5 are
already merged upstream. I did a couple of minor modifications in
commentaries and messages and I think in variables declaration section,
nothing else. I'll send you the patches separately.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:56:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343656610.1513.14.camel@kyv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341389164-24409-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 770 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:05 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> The existing mechanism of reserving PEBs for bad PEB handling has two
> flaws:
> - It is calculated as a percentage of good PEBs instead of total PEBs.
> - There's no limit on the amount of PEBs UBI reserves for future bad
>   eraseblock handling.
> 
> This patchset changes the mechanism to overcome these flaws.

Hi Shmulik, I've separated out the defconfig changes and pushed patches
1,2, and 3 to the UBI tree (the master branch). Patches 4 and 5 are
already merged upstream. I did a couple of minor modifications in
commentaries and messages and I think in variables declaration section,
nothing else. I'll send you the patches separately.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-30 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-04  8:05 [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:05 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18  7:09   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18  7:09     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18  7:09     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:40   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:40     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:40     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-19  6:16     ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-19  6:16       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-19  6:16       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-30 13:00       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-30 13:00         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-30 13:00         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04  8:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-09 10:15   ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09 10:15     ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09 11:02     ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-09 11:02       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 10:28   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:28     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:01     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:01       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 19:55     ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 19:55       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-19  3:35       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-19  3:35         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:40   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:40     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04  8:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] ubi: kill CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] ubi: trivial: fix comment of ubi_calculate_reserved() Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 10:38   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 10:38     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04  8:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ubi: harmonize the update of ubi->beb_rsvd_pebs Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04  8:06   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18 11:32   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18 11:32     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-04  8:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation Richard Weinberger
2012-07-04  8:35   ` Richard Weinberger
2012-07-04 11:33   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-04 11:33     ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-06 15:27     ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-06 15:27       ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-07  6:14       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-07  6:14         ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-07  8:32         ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-07  8:32           ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09  6:58         ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-09  6:58           ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-16 15:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-16 15:33   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-17  7:23   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-17  7:23     ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-18  6:54     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-18  6:54       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-30 13:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-07-30 13:56   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-31  8:19   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-31  8:19     ` Shmulik Ladkani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1343656610.1513.14.camel@kyv \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.