* Oops in audit_copy_inode
@ 2012-07-31 23:02 Peter Moody
2012-08-01 15:56 ` Peter Moody
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Moody @ 2012-07-31 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Kees Cook, mszeredi, viro, Eric Paris
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4903 bytes --]
I seem to have a reliable oops from 3.5.0-rc6 from Linus's tree. I've
bisected it down to, I think, the following commit:
7157486541bffc0dfec912e21ae639b029dae3d3
The Oops:
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.471368] Pid: 2643, comm:
cc1 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6-at17+ #33 LENOVO 4291AK7/4291AK7
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.472342] RIP:
0010:[<ffffffff810cec30>] [<ffffffff810cec30>]
audit_copy_inode+0x10/0x90
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.473300] RSP:
0018:ffff8801f88dfc58 EFLAGS: 00010282
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.474253] RAX:
ffff8801fb320000 RBX: ffff8801f887c508 RCX: 000000000000c7e8
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.475210] RDX:
0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801f3f1d970 RDI: ffff8801f887c508
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.476172] RBP:
ffff8801f88dfc88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.477138] R10:
0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8801f3f1d970
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.478236] R13:
ffff8801f887c4a8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.479218] FS:
00007fd6b9473700(0000) GS:ffff880215200000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.480182] CS: 0010 DS: 0000
ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.481143] CR2:
0000000000000040 CR3: 000000020f6a3000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.482142] DR0:
0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.483121] DR3:
0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.484094] Process cc1 (pid:
2643, threadinfo ffff8801f88de000, task ffff8801fb320000)
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.485070] Stack:
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.486030] ffffffff8161c6fe
ffff8801f887c508 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f887c4a8
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.487011] ffff8801f887c508
ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f88dfcf8 ffffffff810d237c
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.487995] ffffffff810d22bb
0000000000000000 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f4575e40
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.488981] Call Trace:
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.489957]
[<ffffffff8161c6fe>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.490934]
[<ffffffff810d237c>] __audit_inode+0x13c/0x2a0
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.491927]
[<ffffffff810d22bb>] ? __audit_inode+0x7b/0x2a0
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.492916]
[<ffffffff8117b44c>] do_last+0x7ac/0xa90
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.493883]
[<ffffffff8117cad9>] path_openat+0xd9/0x410
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.494852]
[<ffffffff81087f2d>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xbd/0x110
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.495817]
[<ffffffff8101a7a3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.496774]
[<ffffffff8101a819>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.497721]
[<ffffffff8117cf32>] do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.498663]
[<ffffffff8161ed9b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.499609]
[<ffffffff8118a2c2>] ? alloc_fd+0xd2/0x120
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.500579]
[<ffffffff8116c2f8>] do_sys_open+0xf8/0x1d0
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.501514]
[<ffffffff810d1a8c>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xcc/0x310
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.502471]
[<ffffffff8116c3f1>] sys_open+0x21/0x30
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.503384]
[<ffffffff81627529>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.504275] Code: 00 00 c7 45
cc 1f 00 00 00 e9 2c ff ff ff 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 83 ec 20 66 66 66 66 90 <48> 8b 42 40 49 89 f4
48 8d 77 34 48 89 fb 48 89 47 18 48 8b 42
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.506188] RIP
[<ffffffff810cec30>] audit_copy_inode+0x10/0x90
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.507108] RSP <ffff8801f88dfc58>
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.508021] CR2: 0000000000000040
Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.516307] ---[ end trace
bcccee9a00e71a3b ]---
I can generate this oops by doing the following:
sudo /etc/init.d/auditd start ; sudo auditctl -D ; sudo auditctl -a
exit,always -F arch=b64 -S chmod -k oops ; gcc hello.c
The macro expansion in hello.c seems to be important.
Other bits of likely pertinent information: Running Ubuntu.
auditd/auditctl version 1.7.13-1ubuntu2 (ancient..), gcc version
4.4.3.
Please let me know if there's anything else I can provide (but please
cc me, I'm not subscribed to lkml).
Cheers,
peter
--
Peter Moody Google
Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038
[-- Attachment #2: hello.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 99 bytes --]
#include <stdio.h>
#define ME "!"
int main(void) {
printf("hello, world%s\n", ME);
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Oops in audit_copy_inode
2012-07-31 23:02 Oops in audit_copy_inode Peter Moody
@ 2012-08-01 15:56 ` Peter Moody
2012-08-01 16:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Moody @ 2012-08-01 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Kees Cook, mszeredi, viro, Eric Paris
This time with a cleaner Oops:
Pid: 2643, comm: cc1 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6-at17+ #33 LENOVO 4291AK7/4291AK7
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810cec30>] [<ffffffff810cec30>] audit_copy_inode+0x10/0x90
RSP: 0018:ffff8801f88dfc58 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: ffff8801fb320000 RBX: ffff8801f887c508 RCX: 000000000000c7e8
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801f3f1d970 RDI: ffff8801f887c508
RBP: ffff8801f88dfc88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8801f3f1d970
R13: ffff8801f887c4a8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fd6b9473700(0000) GS:ffff880215200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000040 CR3: 000000020f6a3000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process cc1 (pid: 2643, threadinfo ffff8801f88de000, task ffff8801fb320000)
Stack:
ffffffff8161c6fe ffff8801f887c508 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f887c4a8
ffff8801f887c508 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f88dfcf8 ffffffff810d237c
ffffffff810d22bb 0000000000000000 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f4575e40
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8161c6fe>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff810d237c>] __audit_inode+0x13c/0x2a0
[<ffffffff810d22bb>] ? __audit_inode+0x7b/0x2a0
[<ffffffff8117b44c>] do_last+0x7ac/0xa90
[<ffffffff8117cad9>] path_openat+0xd9/0x410
[<ffffffff81087f2d>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xbd/0x110
[<ffffffff8101a7a3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
[<ffffffff8101a819>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff8117cf32>] do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
[<ffffffff8161ed9b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
[<ffffffff8118a2c2>] ? alloc_fd+0xd2/0x120
[<ffffffff8116c2f8>] do_sys_open+0xf8/0x1d0
[<ffffffff810d1a8c>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xcc/0x310
[<ffffffff8116c3f1>] sys_open+0x21/0x30
[<ffffffff81627529>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Code: 00 00 c7 45
cc 1f 00 00 00 e9 2c ff ff ff 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 83 ec 20 66 66 66 66 90 <48> 8b 42 40 49 89 f4
48 8d 77 34 48 89 fb 48 89 47 18 48 8b 42
RIP [<ffffffff810cec30>] audit_copy_inode+0x10/0x90
RSP <ffff8801f88dfc58>
CR2: 0000000000000040
---[ end trace bcccee9a00e71a3b ]---
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Peter Moody <pmoody@google.com> wrote:
> I seem to have a reliable oops from 3.5.0-rc6 from Linus's tree. I've
> bisected it down to, I think, the following commit:
>
> 7157486541bffc0dfec912e21ae639b029dae3d3
>
> The Oops:
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.471368] Pid: 2643, comm:
> cc1 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6-at17+ #33 LENOVO 4291AK7/4291AK7
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.472342] RIP:
> 0010:[<ffffffff810cec30>] [<ffffffff810cec30>]
> audit_copy_inode+0x10/0x90
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.473300] RSP:
> 0018:ffff8801f88dfc58 EFLAGS: 00010282
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.474253] RAX:
> ffff8801fb320000 RBX: ffff8801f887c508 RCX: 000000000000c7e8
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.475210] RDX:
> 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801f3f1d970 RDI: ffff8801f887c508
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.476172] RBP:
> ffff8801f88dfc88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.477138] R10:
> 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8801f3f1d970
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.478236] R13:
> ffff8801f887c4a8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.479218] FS:
> 00007fd6b9473700(0000) GS:ffff880215200000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.480182] CS: 0010 DS: 0000
> ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.481143] CR2:
> 0000000000000040 CR3: 000000020f6a3000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.482142] DR0:
> 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.483121] DR3:
> 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.484094] Process cc1 (pid:
> 2643, threadinfo ffff8801f88de000, task ffff8801fb320000)
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.485070] Stack:
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.486030] ffffffff8161c6fe
> ffff8801f887c508 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f887c4a8
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.487011] ffff8801f887c508
> ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f88dfcf8 ffffffff810d237c
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.487995] ffffffff810d22bb
> 0000000000000000 ffff8801f3f1d970 ffff8801f4575e40
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.488981] Call Trace:
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.489957]
> [<ffffffff8161c6fe>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.490934]
> [<ffffffff810d237c>] __audit_inode+0x13c/0x2a0
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.491927]
> [<ffffffff810d22bb>] ? __audit_inode+0x7b/0x2a0
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.492916]
> [<ffffffff8117b44c>] do_last+0x7ac/0xa90
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.493883]
> [<ffffffff8117cad9>] path_openat+0xd9/0x410
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.494852]
> [<ffffffff81087f2d>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xbd/0x110
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.495817]
> [<ffffffff8101a7a3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.496774]
> [<ffffffff8101a819>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.497721]
> [<ffffffff8117cf32>] do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.498663]
> [<ffffffff8161ed9b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.499609]
> [<ffffffff8118a2c2>] ? alloc_fd+0xd2/0x120
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.500579]
> [<ffffffff8116c2f8>] do_sys_open+0xf8/0x1d0
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.501514]
> [<ffffffff810d1a8c>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xcc/0x310
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.502471]
> [<ffffffff8116c3f1>] sys_open+0x21/0x30
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.503384]
> [<ffffffff81627529>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.504275] Code: 00 00 c7 45
> cc 1f 00 00 00 e9 2c ff ff ff 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
> 55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 83 ec 20 66 66 66 66 90 <48> 8b 42 40 49 89 f4
> 48 8d 77 34 48 89 fb 48 89 47 18 48 8b 42
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.506188] RIP
> [<ffffffff810cec30>] audit_copy_inode+0x10/0x90
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.507108] RSP <ffff8801f88dfc58>
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.508021] CR2: 0000000000000040
> Jul 31 15:32:11 pmoody-x220 kernel: [ 108.516307] ---[ end trace
> bcccee9a00e71a3b ]---
>
> I can generate this oops by doing the following:
>
> sudo /etc/init.d/auditd start ; sudo auditctl -D ; sudo auditctl -a
> exit,always -F arch=b64 -S chmod -k oops ; gcc hello.c
>
> The macro expansion in hello.c seems to be important.
>
> Other bits of likely pertinent information: Running Ubuntu.
> auditd/auditctl version 1.7.13-1ubuntu2 (ancient..), gcc version
> 4.4.3.
>
> Please let me know if there's anything else I can provide (but please
> cc me, I'm not subscribed to lkml).
>
> Cheers,
> peter
>
> --
> Peter Moody Google
> Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038
--
Peter Moody Google 1.650.253.7306
Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Oops in audit_copy_inode
2012-08-01 15:56 ` Peter Moody
@ 2012-08-01 16:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-08-01 17:27 ` Peter Moody
2012-08-02 18:34 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2012-08-01 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Moody; +Cc: linux-kernel, Kees Cook, viro, Eric Paris, miklos
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the report.
Here's a patch. I haven't tested it but I'm pretty confident that it
fixes the bug.
Thanks,
Miklos
Subject: vfs: fix audit_inode on negative dentry
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Peter Moody reported an oops in audit_copy_inode() and bisected it to commit
7157486541 (vfs: do_last(): common slow lookup).
The problem is that audit_inode() in do_last() is called with a negative dentry.
Previously the non-O_CREAT case didn't call audit_inode() here, but now both
O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT opens are handled by the same code.
I really have no idea why this audit_inode() is needed here at all but am afaid
to remove this for fear of breaking audit somehow. So just fix this case by
checking for a negative dentry.
Reported-by: Peter Moody <pmoody@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/namei.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/namei.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/namei.c 2012-08-01 17:47:28.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/namei.c 2012-08-01 17:49:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -2607,10 +2607,12 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
goto finish_open_created;
}
- /*
- * It already exists.
- */
- audit_inode(pathname, path->dentry);
+ if (path->dentry->d_inode) {
+ /*
+ * It already exists.
+ */
+ audit_inode(pathname, path->dentry);
+ }
/*
* If atomic_open() acquired write access it is dropped now due to
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Oops in audit_copy_inode
2012-08-01 16:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
@ 2012-08-01 17:27 ` Peter Moody
2012-08-02 18:34 ` Eric Paris
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Moody @ 2012-08-01 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: linux-kernel, Kees Cook, viro, Eric Paris, miklos
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Here's a patch. I haven't tested it but I'm pretty confident that it
> fixes the bug.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
Ack. I can confirm that I don't Oops with this patch.
Thanks!
Cheers,
peter
--
Peter Moody Google
Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Oops in audit_copy_inode
2012-08-01 16:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-08-01 17:27 ` Peter Moody
@ 2012-08-02 18:34 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-03 7:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2012-08-02 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi
Cc: Peter Moody, linux-kernel, Kees Cook, viro, miklos, jlayton,
linux-fsdevel
I believe this was already found and fixed:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/25/259
Which was pulled by Linus in:
3134f37e931d75931bdf6d4eacd82a3fd26eca7c
-Eric
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 18:11 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Here's a patch. I haven't tested it but I'm pretty confident that it
> fixes the bug.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
>
>
> Subject: vfs: fix audit_inode on negative dentry
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
>
> Peter Moody reported an oops in audit_copy_inode() and bisected it to commit
> 7157486541 (vfs: do_last(): common slow lookup).
>
> The problem is that audit_inode() in do_last() is called with a negative dentry.
>
> Previously the non-O_CREAT case didn't call audit_inode() here, but now both
> O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT opens are handled by the same code.
>
> I really have no idea why this audit_inode() is needed here at all but am afaid
> to remove this for fear of breaking audit somehow. So just fix this case by
> checking for a negative dentry.
>
> Reported-by: Peter Moody <pmoody@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/namei.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/namei.c 2012-08-01 17:47:28.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/namei.c 2012-08-01 17:49:26.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2607,10 +2607,12 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
> goto finish_open_created;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * It already exists.
> - */
> - audit_inode(pathname, path->dentry);
> + if (path->dentry->d_inode) {
> + /*
> + * It already exists.
> + */
> + audit_inode(pathname, path->dentry);
> + }
>
> /*
> * If atomic_open() acquired write access it is dropped now due to
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Oops in audit_copy_inode
2012-08-02 18:34 ` Eric Paris
@ 2012-08-03 7:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2012-08-03 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris
Cc: Peter Moody, linux-kernel, Kees Cook, viro, jlayton,
linux-fsdevel
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> writes:
> I believe this was already found and fixed:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/25/259
>
> Which was pulled by Linus in:
>
> 3134f37e931d75931bdf6d4eacd82a3fd26eca7c
Okay, yes. I was actually CC-d on that, but missed the email.
Thanks,
Miklos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-03 7:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-31 23:02 Oops in audit_copy_inode Peter Moody
2012-08-01 15:56 ` Peter Moody
2012-08-01 16:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-08-01 17:27 ` Peter Moody
2012-08-02 18:34 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-03 7:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.