* [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
@ 2012-08-09 17:43 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2012-08-09 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind1
Cc: Michal Marek, jirislaby, linux-kernel, Adrian Hunter, linux-mtd,
Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, Jiri Slaby
This tag is useless and it breaks automatic builds. It causes rebuilds
for packages that depend on kernel for no real reason.
Further, quoting Michal, who removed most of the users already:
The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
time.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
---
fs/ubifs/super.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index e354832..67af316 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
@@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c)
ubifs_msg("reserved for root: %llu bytes (%llu KiB)",
c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >> 10);
- dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
@ 2012-08-09 17:43 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2012-08-09 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind1
Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, jirislaby, linux-kernel,
Jiri Slaby, Adrian Hunter, linux-mtd, Michal Marek
This tag is useless and it breaks automatic builds. It causes rebuilds
for packages that depend on kernel for no real reason.
Further, quoting Michal, who removed most of the users already:
The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to
repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each
time.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
---
fs/ubifs/super.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index e354832..67af316 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
@@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c)
ubifs_msg("reserved for root: %llu bytes (%llu KiB)",
c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >> 10);
- dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
2012-08-09 17:43 ` Jiri Slaby
@ 2012-08-24 11:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-08-24 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Michal Marek, jirislaby, linux-kernel, Adrian Hunter, linux-mtd,
Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 794 bytes --]
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:43 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> index e354832..67af316 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> @@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c)
> ubifs_msg("reserved for root: %llu bytes (%llu KiB)",
> c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >> 10);
>
> - dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
> dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
> dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
> dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, thanks! Does it make sense to hurry up and
send this to 3.6? Or it can be merged to 3.7 normally?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
@ 2012-08-24 11:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-08-24 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, jirislaby, linux-kernel,
Adrian Hunter, linux-mtd, Michal Marek
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 794 bytes --]
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:43 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> index e354832..67af316 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> @@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c)
> ubifs_msg("reserved for root: %llu bytes (%llu KiB)",
> c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >> 10);
>
> - dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
> dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
> dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
> dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, thanks! Does it make sense to hurry up and
send this to 3.6? Or it can be merged to 3.7 normally?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
2012-08-24 11:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2012-08-24 11:51 ` Jiri Slaby
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2012-08-24 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind1
Cc: Michal Marek, jirislaby, linux-kernel, Adrian Hunter, linux-mtd,
Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2012 01:54 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:43 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c index
>> e354832..67af316 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c +++
>> b/fs/ubifs/super.c @@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int
>> mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c) ubifs_msg("reserved for root:
>> %llu bytes (%llu KiB)", c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >>
>> 10);
>>
>> - dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
>> dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
>> dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
>> dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
>
> Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, thanks! Does it make sense to hurry up
> and send this to 3.6? Or it can be merged to 3.7 normally?
No need to rush. We have the patch in a local queue anyway.
thanks,
- --
js
suse labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=7Zm3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
@ 2012-08-24 11:51 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2012-08-24 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind1
Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, jirislaby, linux-kernel,
Adrian Hunter, linux-mtd, Michal Marek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/24/2012 01:54 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:43 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c index
>> e354832..67af316 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c +++
>> b/fs/ubifs/super.c @@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int
>> mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c) ubifs_msg("reserved for root:
>> %llu bytes (%llu KiB)", c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >>
>> 10);
>>
>> - dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
>> dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
>> dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
>> dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
>
> Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, thanks! Does it make sense to hurry up
> and send this to 3.6? Or it can be merged to 3.7 normally?
No need to rush. We have the patch in a local queue anyway.
thanks,
- --
js
suse labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=7Zm3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-24 11:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-09 17:43 [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__ Jiri Slaby
2012-08-09 17:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-08-24 11:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-24 11:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-24 11:51 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-08-24 11:51 ` Jiri Slaby
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.