From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: richardcochran@gmail.com, matthew.vick@intel.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and locations.
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:56:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345830987.32359.4.camel@joe2Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120824.111238.1400056420671100883.davem@davemloft.net>
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:12 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:22:34 -0700
> > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 08:32 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:02:25PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> > Improving code clarity and consistency isn't churn.
> >> This patch series moves code around for no good reason. That is, by
> >> definition, churn.
> >
> > For your definition of good.
>
> I think the people doing all of the actual development and
> maintainence of the code get to decide how to define good. And in
> this case that's basically the Intel NIC development team, not you.
Just for clarity, you do mean Richard's view and not mine.
I agree with these proposed changes.
> Moving functions around is a very valuable and useful cleanup quite
> often.
>
> So you can count me in on their definition of "good" as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 9:56 [net-next 00/13][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 01/13] e1000e: use correct type for read of 32-bit register Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 02/13] e1000e: cleanup strict checkpatch check Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 03/13] e1000e: cleanup - remove inapplicable comment Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 04/13] e1000e: cleanup checkpatch PREFER_PR_LEVEL warning Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 14:01 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-24 18:02 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-24 21:19 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-24 22:43 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 05/13] e1000e: cleanup - remove unnecessary variable Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 06/13] e1000e: update driver version number Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 07/13] e1000e: cleanup strict checkpatch MEMORY_BARRIER checks Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 08/13] igb: Add loopback test support for i210 Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 09/13] igb: reduce Rx header size Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 10/13] igb: Tidy up wrapping for CONFIG_IGB_PTP Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 11:03 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 16:09 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 17:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 17:40 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 18:03 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 18:03 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-08-23 18:40 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-24 7:04 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-24 10:10 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-24 16:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-24 19:38 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-08-25 6:20 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-26 1:33 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-08-26 13:01 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 11:28 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 16:27 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and locations Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 11:16 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 16:22 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 17:53 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 18:00 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-08-23 18:11 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 18:44 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-24 6:55 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-24 15:52 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-25 5:48 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-27 15:23 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-27 16:44 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-27 17:39 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 18:35 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 18:48 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-08-23 18:58 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-24 3:02 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-24 6:32 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-24 9:22 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-24 15:12 ` David Miller
2012-08-24 17:56 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 12/13] igb: Correct PTP support query from ethtool Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 11:24 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 16:38 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 9:56 ` [net-next 13/13] igb: Store the MAC address in the name in the PTP struct Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-23 10:45 ` Richard Cochran
2012-08-23 16:05 ` Vick, Matthew
2012-08-23 21:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-24 6:19 ` Richard Cochran
2012-09-06 23:04 ` Keller, Jacob E
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345830987.32359.4.camel@joe2Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.vick@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.