All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:58:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347281890-23781-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Instead of using a rather error-prone method of looking for output
package files in order to determine if a package got created, use the
.packaged file within pkgdata.

This fixes two separate issues:
* Some packages apparently not being found by this code e.g. all
  apm/apmd packages when using ipk packaging.
* Buggy implementation of this checking code which triggered an
  exception during the event handler if PKGV was overridden on a
  per-package basis (as it is with external-sourcery-toolchain), which
  blocked Hob from completing parsing at 99% - fixes [YOCTO #2651].

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
---
 meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass |   34 ++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
index 26cce60..bd7b249 100644
--- a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
@@ -14,32 +14,14 @@ python packageinfo_handler () {
                 for root, dirs, files in os.walk(pkgdata_dir):
                     for pkgname in files:
                         if pkgname.endswith('.packaged'):
-                            continue
-                        sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(root + pkgname)
-                        sdata['PKG'] = pkgname
-                        pkgrename = sdata['PKG_%s' % pkgname]
-                        pkgv = sdata['PKGV'].replace('-', '+')
-                        pkgr = sdata['PKGR']
-                        # We found there are some renaming issue with certain architecture.
-                        # For example, armv7a-vfp-neon, it will use armv7a in the rpm file. This is the workaround for it.
-                        arch_tmp = arch.split('-')[0]
-                        if os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging):
-                            pkginfolist.append(sdata)
+                            pkgname = pkgname[:-9]
+                            pkgdatafile = root + pkgname
+                            try:
+                                sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(pkgdatafile)
+                                sdata['PKG'] = pkgname
+                                pkginfolist.append(sdata)
+                            except Exception as e:
+                                bb.warn("Failed to read pkgdata file %s: %s: %s" % (pkgdatafile, e.__class__, str(e)))
         bb.event.fire(bb.event.PackageInfo(pkginfolist), e.data)
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5




             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10 12:58 Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-09-12 17:46 ` [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1347281890-23781-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.