All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:46:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5050CA6A.80102@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347281890-23781-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>

On 09/10/2012 05:58 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Instead of using a rather error-prone method of looking for output
> package files in order to determine if a package got created, use the
> .packaged file within pkgdata.
>
> This fixes two separate issues:
> * Some packages apparently not being found by this code e.g. all
>    apm/apmd packages when using ipk packaging.
> * Buggy implementation of this checking code which triggered an
>    exception during the event handler if PKGV was overridden on a
>    per-package basis (as it is with external-sourcery-toolchain), which
>    blocked Hob from completing parsing at 99% - fixes [YOCTO #2651].
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass |   34 ++++++++--------------------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
Merged into OE-Core

Thanks
	Sau!

> diff --git a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
> index 26cce60..bd7b249 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
> @@ -14,32 +14,14 @@ python packageinfo_handler () {
>                   for root, dirs, files in os.walk(pkgdata_dir):
>                       for pkgname in files:
>                           if pkgname.endswith('.packaged'):
> -                            continue
> -                        sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(root + pkgname)
> -                        sdata['PKG'] = pkgname
> -                        pkgrename = sdata['PKG_%s' % pkgname]
> -                        pkgv = sdata['PKGV'].replace('-', '+')
> -                        pkgr = sdata['PKGR']
> -                        # We found there are some renaming issue with certain architecture.
> -                        # For example, armv7a-vfp-neon, it will use armv7a in the rpm file. This is the workaround for it.
> -                        arch_tmp = arch.split('-')[0]
> -                        if os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
> -                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
> -                                          pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging):
> -                            pkginfolist.append(sdata)
> +                            pkgname = pkgname[:-9]
> +                            pkgdatafile = root + pkgname
> +                            try:
> +                                sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(pkgdatafile)
> +                                sdata['PKG'] = pkgname
> +                                pkginfolist.append(sdata)
> +                            except Exception as e:
> +                                bb.warn("Failed to read pkgdata file %s: %s: %s" % (pkgdatafile, e.__class__, str(e)))
>           bb.event.fire(bb.event.PackageInfo(pkginfolist), e.data)
>   }
>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10 12:58 [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists Paul Eggleton
2012-09-12 17:46 ` Saul Wold [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5050CA6A.80102@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.