From: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
To: "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"greg@kroah.com" <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:14:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348557420.18425.0.camel@gitbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925163724.703a41b9438fbaef84b7480e@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:37 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-uhci.txt between commit
> 100d45970327 ("ARM: vt8500: Add support for UHCI companion controller")
> from the usb tree and commit 95e9fd10f06c ("arm: vt8500: doc: Add device
> tree bindings for arch-vt8500 devices") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I used the version from the arm-soc tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
Both versions were the same (my bad for not removing it from the arm-soc
patch).
Thanks Stephen
Regards
Tony P
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:14:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348557420.18425.0.camel@gitbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925163724.703a41b9438fbaef84b7480e@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:37 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-uhci.txt between commit
> 100d45970327 ("ARM: vt8500: Add support for UHCI companion controller")
> from the usb tree and commit 95e9fd10f06c ("arm: vt8500: doc: Add device
> tree bindings for arch-vt8500 devices") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I used the version from the arm-soc tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
Both versions were the same (my bad for not removing it from the arm-soc
patch).
Thanks Stephen
Regards
Tony P
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
To: "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"greg@kroah.com" <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:14:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348557420.18425.0.camel@gitbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925163724.703a41b9438fbaef84b7480e@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 809 bytes --]
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:37 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-uhci.txt between commit
> 100d45970327 ("ARM: vt8500: Add support for UHCI companion controller")
> from the usb tree and commit 95e9fd10f06c ("arm: vt8500: doc: Add device
> tree bindings for arch-vt8500 devices") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I used the version from the arm-soc tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
Both versions were the same (my bad for not removing it from the arm-soc
patch).
Thanks Stephen
Regards
Tony P
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 6:37 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-25 6:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-25 6:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-25 7:14 ` Tony Prisk [this message]
2012-09-25 7:14 ` Tony Prisk
2012-09-25 7:14 ` Tony Prisk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-27 0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27 0:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27 0:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-05-27 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-04-07 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-07 0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-07 0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-29 7:57 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-29 7:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-29 7:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-21 6:45 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-21 6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-21 6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-27 4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-27 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-27 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-17 8:02 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-17 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-17 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-08 6:03 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-08 6:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-08 6:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-08 6:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-08 6:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-08 6:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348557420.18425.0.camel@gitbox \
--to=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.