* CIFS - VFS error question
@ 2012-09-26 7:33 ROBIN CERNIN
[not found] ` <CAFdSyFFkcSbBrqH7mgBJxFL+kfZNuMBK+8ZGoarPxQeAS0rXng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: ROBIN CERNIN @ 2012-09-26 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hello,
First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils.
Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs:
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1.
el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko
version: 1.60RH
description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS
Specification e.g. Samba and Windows
license: GPL
author: Steve French <sfrench-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E
depends:
vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1
parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including
header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int)
parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4
Range: 1 to 64 (int)
parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default:
30 Range: 2 to 256 (int)
parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server.
Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int)
module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e
on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages:
Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222
Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231
Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236
Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5
Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208
Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857
Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442
Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I
dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see
these errors.
Thank you in advanced,
Best Regards,
Robin Cernin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAFdSyFFkcSbBrqH7mgBJxFL+kfZNuMBK+8ZGoarPxQeAS0rXng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: CIFS - VFS error question [not found] ` <CAFdSyFFkcSbBrqH7mgBJxFL+kfZNuMBK+8ZGoarPxQeAS0rXng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-09-26 17:42 ` Steve French 2012-09-27 8:37 ` Sachin Prabhu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Steve French @ 2012-09-26 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ROBIN CERNIN; +Cc: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Command 50 (which apparently timed out when the server did not respond) is "Transact 2" which is used for multiple purposes (looking up file names, listing directory contents - among others) so is hard to speculate about. After disconnecting from the server, the client retried and got a generic "EIO" error. Although RedHat does update their kernel with bugfixes, this kernel is almost six years old - do you get this error with a more recent kernel? What is the server type? On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:33 AM, ROBIN CERNIN <cerninr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Hello, > > First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils. > Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs: > > filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1. > el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko > version: 1.60RH > description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS > Specification e.g. Samba and Windows > license: GPL > author: Steve French <sfrench-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E > depends: > vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 > parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including > header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int) > parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 > Range: 1 to 64 (int) > parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: > 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int) > parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. > Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int) > module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e > > on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages: > > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222 > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231 > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236 > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5 > Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208 > Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857 > Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442 > > > Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I > dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see > these errors. > > Thank you in advanced, > Best Regards, > Robin Cernin > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Thanks, Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIFS - VFS error question [not found] ` <CAFdSyFFkcSbBrqH7mgBJxFL+kfZNuMBK+8ZGoarPxQeAS0rXng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2012-09-26 17:42 ` Steve French @ 2012-09-27 8:37 ` Sachin Prabhu 2012-09-27 8:59 ` ROBIN CERNIN 2012-09-27 13:04 ` Jeff Layton 1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Sachin Prabhu @ 2012-09-27 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ROBIN CERNIN; +Cc: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:33 +0200, ROBIN CERNIN wrote: > Hello, > > First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils. > Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs: > > filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1. > el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko > version: 1.60RH > description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS > Specification e.g. Samba and Windows > license: GPL > author: Steve French <sfrench-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E > depends: > vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 > parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including > header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int) > parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 > Range: 1 to 64 (int) > parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: > 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int) > parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. > Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int) > module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e > > on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages: > > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222 > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231 > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236 > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5 > Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208 > Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857 > Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442 > > > Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I > dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see > these errors. Hi Robin, Did you have any network outages or network congestion at those times? It appears the client for some reason couldn't receive a response from the server. Sachin Prabhu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIFS - VFS error question 2012-09-27 8:37 ` Sachin Prabhu @ 2012-09-27 8:59 ` ROBIN CERNIN 2012-09-27 13:04 ` Jeff Layton 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: ROBIN CERNIN @ 2012-09-27 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sachin Prabhu, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Hi all, thank you for great communication with you, I was not hoping that someone will actually answer me. This looks to me that we are not yet doomed:) and anyway where is the network in perfect condition...am I right? :-) however I am not aware of any outage, depending how much network this needs. Packets are lost here and there everyday... This doesn't seems to be a trouble problem as nobody is complaining but this bothers me because it fills my /var/log/messages and informs me every time. I first saw these messages and didn't find any explanation for them. I thought that it would be nice to have a comments on the errors so if also other people get error they can look it up in Wiki or somewhere. I think that in the Internet are plenty of questions but not real answers. And to be it reliable message I though you guys could make something because you are the ones who can:) Steve already explained very nicely "cmd 50 response" which is time out on listing files, directories and others. Which i know can occur in network disturbance. Here are again the errors still getting: kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in Close = -11. kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5. kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -6. I have not checked running CIFS on newer kernel version yet. I ll have to find some servers first. I thought this is something that I could ignore or filter from my messages as this I thought may be let's say access denied or connection closed by other side but again if I do that I just think if i m not going to miss some big problem then. Thank you all, Best Regards, Robin Cernin On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:33 +0200, ROBIN CERNIN wrote: >> Hello, >> >> First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils. >> Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs: >> >> filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1. >> el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko >> version: 1.60RH >> description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS >> Specification e.g. Samba and Windows >> license: GPL >> author: Steve French <sfrench-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >> srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E >> depends: >> vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 >> parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including >> header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int) >> parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 >> Range: 1 to 64 (int) >> parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: >> 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int) >> parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. >> Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int) >> module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e >> >> on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages: >> >> Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222 >> Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231 >> Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236 >> Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 >> Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5 >> Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208 >> Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857 >> Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442 >> >> >> Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I >> dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see >> these errors. > Hi Robin, > > Did you have any network outages or network congestion at those times? > It appears the client for some reason couldn't receive a response from > the server. > > Sachin Prabhu > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIFS - VFS error question 2012-09-27 8:37 ` Sachin Prabhu 2012-09-27 8:59 ` ROBIN CERNIN @ 2012-09-27 13:04 ` Jeff Layton [not found] ` <20120927090409.3d2febe7-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jeff Layton @ 2012-09-27 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sachin Prabhu; +Cc: ROBIN CERNIN, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:37:09 +0100 Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:33 +0200, ROBIN CERNIN wrote: > > Hello, > > > > First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils. > > Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs: > > > > filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1. > > el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko > > version: 1.60RH > > description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS > > Specification e.g. Samba and Windows > > license: GPL > > author: Steve French <sfrench-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E > > depends: > > vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 > > parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including > > header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int) > > parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 > > Range: 1 to 64 (int) > > parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: > > 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int) > > parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. > > Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int) > > module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e > > > > on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages: > > > > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222 > > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231 > > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236 > > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 > > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5 > > Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208 > > Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857 > > Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442 > > As Steve pointed out the above indicates a lot of timed-out requests. The EIO errors however are somewhat troubling. It's not clear what would have caused that... > > > > Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I > > dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see > > these errors. > Hi Robin, > > Did you have any network outages or network congestion at those times? > It appears the client for some reason couldn't receive a response from > the server. > > Sachin Prabhu > It's not uncommon for windows servers to take a long time to respond to certain types of requests. For instance, writes that are long past the EOF can take *minutes*. NTFS doesn't do sparse files efficiently and has to zero-fill the gaps before it replies. More recent kernels (including RHEL6) implement a different mechanism for timing out requests that's more resilient in the face of this sort of server behavior. RHEL5 however is approaching its end of life, and backporting something that invasive is probably a non-starter. If you have a RH support contract, you may want to open a case so we can help you do some better diagnosis. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20120927090409.3d2febe7-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: CIFS - VFS error question [not found] ` <20120927090409.3d2febe7-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org> @ 2012-09-28 21:03 ` ROBIN CERNIN 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: ROBIN CERNIN @ 2012-09-28 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Layton Cc: Sachin Prabhu, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Hi, this problem as you said looks like that disturbance in network that disconnects the CIFS share and server is trying to write to it when its disconnected. We will see if the automated script that tries to remount the CIFS share automatically when network disturbance disconnects it will help... I am very satisfied with RHEL 5, we dont need case for this as small script could fix this. I am not bothered about time outs as these seems not to be problem at all. Also we have our own apps that runs on RHEL 5 and are written for it especially. and thanks Steve for explaining. Thank you and appreciate your help, with Best Regards, Robin On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:37:09 +0100 > Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:33 +0200, ROBIN CERNIN wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils. >> > Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs: >> > >> > filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1. >> > el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko >> > version: 1.60RH >> > description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS >> > Specification e.g. Samba and Windows >> > license: GPL >> > author: Steve French <sfrench-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >> > srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E >> > depends: >> > vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 >> > parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including >> > header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int) >> > parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 >> > Range: 1 to 64 (int) >> > parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: >> > 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int) >> > parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. >> > Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int) >> > module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e >> > >> > on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages: >> > >> > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222 >> > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231 >> > Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236 >> > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 >> > Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5 >> > Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208 >> > Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857 >> > Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442 >> > > > As Steve pointed out the above indicates a lot of timed-out requests. > The EIO errors however are somewhat troubling. It's not clear what > would have caused that... > >> > >> > Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I >> > dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see >> > these errors. >> Hi Robin, >> >> Did you have any network outages or network congestion at those times? >> It appears the client for some reason couldn't receive a response from >> the server. >> >> Sachin Prabhu >> > > It's not uncommon for windows servers to take a long time to respond to > certain types of requests. For instance, writes that are long past the > EOF can take *minutes*. NTFS doesn't do sparse files efficiently and > has to zero-fill the gaps before it replies. > > More recent kernels (including RHEL6) implement a different mechanism > for timing out requests that's more resilient in the face of this sort > of server behavior. RHEL5 however is approaching its end of life, and > backporting something that invasive is probably a non-starter. > > If you have a RH support contract, you may want to open a case so we > can help you do some better diagnosis. > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-28 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-26 7:33 CIFS - VFS error question ROBIN CERNIN
[not found] ` <CAFdSyFFkcSbBrqH7mgBJxFL+kfZNuMBK+8ZGoarPxQeAS0rXng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-26 17:42 ` Steve French
2012-09-27 8:37 ` Sachin Prabhu
2012-09-27 8:59 ` ROBIN CERNIN
2012-09-27 13:04 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20120927090409.3d2febe7-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-28 21:03 ` ROBIN CERNIN
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.