From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu/rockchip: Runtime PM fixes
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13492452.cxnNOAAFxb@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824155059.qskwdxmc6ws3hwtv@localhost>
Am Freitag, 24. August 2018, 17:50:59 CEST schrieb Olof Johansson:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > This small series addresses a couple of runtime PM issues I've spotted
> > while running 4.18 on a Chromebook Plus (kevin, rk3399) platform, and
> > specifically doing kexec.
> >
> > In order to avoid making a complete mess of the IOMMU code, Heiko has
> > requested that all RK platforms would select CONFIG_PM, which
> > simplifies a lot of things. I've kept 32 and 64bit patches separate,
> > but feel free to squash them into on if that's more convenient.
> >
> > Note that even with these patches, kexec is still fairly broken on
> > rk3399, as the VOP is never turned off (see [1] for a fix).
> >
> > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg670229.html
> >
> > * From v1:
> > - Collected RBs from Heiko
> > - Added two patches forcing CONFIG_PM on all Rockchip platforms at
> > Heiko's request, following the example set by Tegra platforms.
>
> Thanks, applied to our next/late branch which I plan to send in tomorrow.
that was a quick turn around :-) .
Thanks for picking the series.
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu/rockchip: Runtime PM fixes
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13492452.cxnNOAAFxb@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824155059.qskwdxmc6ws3hwtv@localhost>
Am Freitag, 24. August 2018, 17:50:59 CEST schrieb Olof Johansson:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > This small series addresses a couple of runtime PM issues I've spotted
> > while running 4.18 on a Chromebook Plus (kevin, rk3399) platform, and
> > specifically doing kexec.
> >
> > In order to avoid making a complete mess of the IOMMU code, Heiko has
> > requested that all RK platforms would select CONFIG_PM, which
> > simplifies a lot of things. I've kept 32 and 64bit patches separate,
> > but feel free to squash them into on if that's more convenient.
> >
> > Note that even with these patches, kexec is still fairly broken on
> > rk3399, as the VOP is never turned off (see [1] for a fix).
> >
> > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg670229.html
> >
> > * From v1:
> > - Collected RBs from Heiko
> > - Added two patches forcing CONFIG_PM on all Rockchip platforms at
> > Heiko's request, following the example set by Tegra platforms.
>
> Thanks, applied to our next/late branch which I plan to send in tomorrow.
that was a quick turn around :-) .
Thanks for picking the series.
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
arm@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu/rockchip: Runtime PM fixes
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:08:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13492452.cxnNOAAFxb@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824155059.qskwdxmc6ws3hwtv@localhost>
Am Freitag, 24. August 2018, 17:50:59 CEST schrieb Olof Johansson:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:06:33PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > This small series addresses a couple of runtime PM issues I've spotted
> > while running 4.18 on a Chromebook Plus (kevin, rk3399) platform, and
> > specifically doing kexec.
> >
> > In order to avoid making a complete mess of the IOMMU code, Heiko has
> > requested that all RK platforms would select CONFIG_PM, which
> > simplifies a lot of things. I've kept 32 and 64bit patches separate,
> > but feel free to squash them into on if that's more convenient.
> >
> > Note that even with these patches, kexec is still fairly broken on
> > rk3399, as the VOP is never turned off (see [1] for a fix).
> >
> > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg670229.html
> >
> > * From v1:
> > - Collected RBs from Heiko
> > - Added two patches forcing CONFIG_PM on all Rockchip platforms at
> > Heiko's request, following the example set by Tegra platforms.
>
> Thanks, applied to our next/late branch which I plan to send in tomorrow.
that was a quick turn around :-) .
Thanks for picking the series.
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-24 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-24 15:06 [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu/rockchip: Runtime PM fixes Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: rockchip: Force CONFIG_PM on Rockchip systems Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: " Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/rockchip: Handle errors returned from PM framework Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/rockchip: Move irq request past pm_runtime_enable Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-24 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu/rockchip: Runtime PM fixes Olof Johansson
2018-08-24 15:50 ` Olof Johansson
2018-08-24 18:08 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2018-08-24 18:08 ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-08-24 18:08 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13492452.cxnNOAAFxb@phil \
--to=heiko-4mtyjxux2i+zqb+pc5nmwq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jeffy.chen-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.