[lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (coretemp) Drop N4xx, N5xx, D4xx, D5xx CPUs from tjmax table

[lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (coretemp) Drop N4xx, N5xx, D4xx, D5xx CPUs from tjmax table

[Guenter Roeck]

Since N4xx, N5xx, D4xx, and D5xx are now reliably detected using the model ID
and the stepping/mask, drop the respective entries from tjmax_table.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |    8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 7107096..96ab10c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -196,14 +196,6 @@ struct tjmax {
 };
 
 static const struct tjmax __cpuinitconst tjmax_table[] = {
-	{ "CPU D410", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU D425", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU D510", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU D525", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU N450", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU N455", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU N470", 100000 },
-	{ "CPU N475", 100000 },
 	{ "CPU  230", 100000 },
 	{ "CPU  330", 125000 },
 };
-- 
1.7.9.7


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (coretemp) Drop N4xx, N5xx, D4xx, D5xx CPUs from tjmax table

[Jean Delvare]

On Tue,  9 Oct 2012 14:09:01 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Since N4xx, N5xx, D4xx, and D5xx are now reliably detected using the model ID
> and the stepping/mask, drop the respective entries from tjmax_table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |    8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index 7107096..96ab10c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -196,14 +196,6 @@ struct tjmax {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct tjmax __cpuinitconst tjmax_table[] = {
> -	{ "CPU D410", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU D425", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU D510", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU D525", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU N450", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU N455", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU N470", 100000 },
> -	{ "CPU N475", 100000 },
>  	{ "CPU  230", 100000 },
>  	{ "CPU  330", 125000 },
>  };

Great, matching by model is certainly faster.

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors