From: Shuah Khan <shuah.khan-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
To: Tom Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
shuahkhan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Prevent devices with RMRRs from being placed into SI Domain during startup
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:28:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350408491.2785.28.camel@lorien2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121016164905.14478.21080.sendpatchset-CvFtHRyKCAIXAUP4FAKr9K0S01CSe8MM@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:50 +0000, Tom Mingarelli wrote:
> This patch is to prevent devices that have RMRRs associated with them
> from getting placed into the SI Domain during init. We don't put USB devices
> into this category, however. This fixes the issue where the RMRR info
> for devices being placed in and out of the SI Domain gets lost.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
> ----
> PATCH v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/204
> PATCH v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/354
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff -up ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c.ORIG ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> --- ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c.ORIG 2012-10-16 09:34:23.148089944 -0500
> +++ ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c 2012-10-16 09:56:56.905932861 -0500
> @@ -2320,8 +2320,41 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dm
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool device_has_rmrr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
> + for (i = 0; i < rmrr->devices_cnt; i++) {
> + /*
> + * Here we are just concerned with checking each device
> + * that has an RMRR associated with it and not allow it
> + * to be placed into the SI Domain during startup.
> + */
> + if (rmrr->devices[i] == dev)
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int iommu_should_identity_map(struct pci_dev *pdev, int startup)
> {
> +
> + if (startup) {
> + /*
> + * This is where we will refuse any device that has an
> + * RMRR associated with it and is not a USB device and
> + * NOT allow it to be placed into the SI Domain. We
> + * only do this on startup. We don't need a separate bit
> + * for this because it could be ANY device.
> + */
> + if (device_has_rmrr(pdev) &&
> + (pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB)
Forgot to ask in my last response. Is it sufficient to check _USB. Are
we missing any other devices that use RMRR that would qualify?
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> if ((iommu_identity_mapping & IDENTMAP_AZALIA) && IS_AZALIA(pdev))
> return 1;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@hp.com>
To: Tom Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@hp.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
shuahkhan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Prevent devices with RMRRs from being placed into SI Domain during startup
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:28:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350408491.2785.28.camel@lorien2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121016164905.14478.21080.sendpatchset@RHEL63BL460c.osen.hp.com>
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:50 +0000, Tom Mingarelli wrote:
> This patch is to prevent devices that have RMRRs associated with them
> from getting placed into the SI Domain during init. We don't put USB devices
> into this category, however. This fixes the issue where the RMRR info
> for devices being placed in and out of the SI Domain gets lost.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@hp.com>
> ----
> PATCH v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/15/204
> PATCH v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/354
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff -up ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c.ORIG ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> --- ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c.ORIG 2012-10-16 09:34:23.148089944 -0500
> +++ ./drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c 2012-10-16 09:56:56.905932861 -0500
> @@ -2320,8 +2320,41 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dm
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool device_has_rmrr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr;
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
> + for (i = 0; i < rmrr->devices_cnt; i++) {
> + /*
> + * Here we are just concerned with checking each device
> + * that has an RMRR associated with it and not allow it
> + * to be placed into the SI Domain during startup.
> + */
> + if (rmrr->devices[i] == dev)
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int iommu_should_identity_map(struct pci_dev *pdev, int startup)
> {
> +
> + if (startup) {
> + /*
> + * This is where we will refuse any device that has an
> + * RMRR associated with it and is not a USB device and
> + * NOT allow it to be placed into the SI Domain. We
> + * only do this on startup. We don't need a separate bit
> + * for this because it could be ANY device.
> + */
> + if (device_has_rmrr(pdev) &&
> + (pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB)
Forgot to ask in my last response. Is it sufficient to check _USB. Are
we missing any other devices that use RMRR that would qualify?
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> if ((iommu_identity_mapping & IDENTMAP_AZALIA) && IS_AZALIA(pdev))
> return 1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 16:50 [PATCH v3] Prevent devices with RMRRs from being placed into SI Domain during startup Tom Mingarelli
2012-10-16 16:50 ` Tom Mingarelli
[not found] ` <20121016164905.14478.21080.sendpatchset-CvFtHRyKCAIXAUP4FAKr9K0S01CSe8MM@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-16 16:59 ` Alex Williamson
2012-10-16 16:59 ` Alex Williamson
[not found] ` <1350406780.2112.254.camel-xdHQ/5r00wBBDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-16 17:38 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2012-10-16 17:38 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2012-10-16 17:26 ` Shuah Khan
2012-10-16 17:26 ` Shuah Khan
2012-10-16 17:40 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2012-10-16 17:40 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2012-10-16 17:28 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2012-10-16 17:28 ` Shuah Khan
2012-10-16 17:41 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2012-10-16 17:41 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350408491.2785.28.camel@lorien2 \
--to=shuah.khan-vxdhtt5mjny@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shuahkhan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thomas.mingarelli-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.