From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] change_protection(): Count the number of pages affected
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352883029-7885-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
What do you guys think about this mprotect() optimization?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
Ingo Molnar (1):
mm: Optimize the TLB flush of sys_mprotect() and change_protection()
users
Peter Zijlstra (1):
sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual
memory ranges
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 8 ++++++--
include/linux/mm.h | 6 +++---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
mm/hugetlb.c | 10 ++++++++--
mm/mprotect.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] change_protection(): Count the number of pages affected
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352883029-7885-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
What do you guys think about this mprotect() optimization?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
Ingo Molnar (1):
mm: Optimize the TLB flush of sys_mprotect() and change_protection()
users
Peter Zijlstra (1):
sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual
memory ranges
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 8 ++++++--
include/linux/mm.h | 6 +++---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
mm/hugetlb.c | 10 ++++++++--
mm/mprotect.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
1.7.11.7
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-14 8:50 Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-11-14 8:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] change_protection(): Count the number of pages affected Ingo Molnar
2012-11-14 8:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual memory ranges Ingo Molnar
2012-11-14 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-14 18:37 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 18:37 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 8:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Optimize the TLB flush of sys_mprotect() and change_protection() users Ingo Molnar
2012-11-14 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-14 18:39 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 18:39 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 18:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] change_protection(): Count the number of pages affected Linus Torvalds
2012-11-14 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-14 18:43 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 18:43 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-14 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-14 22:04 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-14 22:04 ` Rik van Riel
2012-11-16 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-11-16 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352883029-7885-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.