From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] numa/core updates
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 17:13:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354464796-14343-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
I've been testing wider workloads and here's two more small and
obvious patches rounding up numa/core behavior around the edges.
The NUMA code should now be pretty unintrusive to all but the
long-running, memory-intense workloads where it's expected to
make a (positive) difference.
Short-run workloads like kbuild or hackbench don't trigger the
NUMA code now. The limits can be reconsidered later on,
iteratively - the goal now is to not regress.
Thanks,
Ingo
-------------->
Ingo Molnar (2):
sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic
sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++
6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] numa/core updates
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 17:13:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354464796-14343-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
I've been testing wider workloads and here's two more small and
obvious patches rounding up numa/core behavior around the edges.
The NUMA code should now be pretty unintrusive to all but the
long-running, memory-intense workloads where it's expected to
make a (positive) difference.
Short-run workloads like kbuild or hackbench don't trigger the
NUMA code now. The limits can be reconsidered later on,
iteratively - the goal now is to not regress.
Thanks,
Ingo
-------------->
Ingo Molnar (2):
sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic
sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++
6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
1.7.11.7
next reply other threads:[~2012-12-02 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-02 16:13 Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-12-02 16:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] numa/core updates Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 19:45 ` [PATCH 2/2, v2] " Ingo Molnar
2012-12-02 19:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354464796-14343-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.