From: MisterE <MisterE2002@zonnet.nl>
To: Alexander Sabourenkov <screwdriver@lxnt.info>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
htejun@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
jeff@garzik.orglinux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re[2]: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:39:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <135469746.20071017143929@zonnet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47035355.2040405@lxnt.info>
Hello,
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 10:31:17 AM, you wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of replacing both 3512 controllers with a Promise SATA300
>>> TX4. Do you know if there are problems with this device?
>>
>> (please don't top-post)
>>
>> There are no known data-corruption issues with Promise SATA cards.
>> However, some of them, especially the 2nd generation SATA300 TX4,
>> are known to trigger intermittent error interrupts (that are dealt
>> with but may cause a speed reduction) in some systems. We're still
>> scratching our heads on that issue.
>>
> But see this thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=119122463403033&w=2
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg14868.html
> Personally I would not recommend Promise SATA300 TX4 at the moment.
After all the problems i had with the sweex 3512 cards i returned them
to the shop and decided to buy a Sata300 TX4 (because the shop nearby
had one. Unfortunately the shops in the region don't have Highpoints)
Things looked promising when i inserted the card in both Intel D815EEA
motherboards. No problems detecting the hard drives (unlike with the 3512 cards).
With the 3512 i had LOTS of error messages and corrupt data when writing to it.
Using a separate videocard, instead of the onboard one, seemed to reduce the amount of errors.
But after some heavy reading/writing with the promise i got 2 errors. (see log file).
But i did'nt find any corrupt files. I can not reproduce the error.
I'm not sure if these are the "intermittent error interrupts" Mikael
Pettersson mentioned?
ps: as you can i see i got at the boot some errors from the boot disk
(hda). I not sure what is wrong with it. Sometimes it produce these
errors. Used a non-destructive read-write test with badblocks but no
bad sectors found. I don't know if this could influence the sata controller.
Alexander Sabourenkov can you please tell me where i can find the
"Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond,
reset failed" thread you mentioned?
I also see that the driver is now at version 2.10. Is there something
really critical changed? I've tried testing with Debian stable
(2.6.18-4-686; sata_promise: 1.04) and with Debian Unstable
(2.6.22-2-686; sata_promise: 2.07). 2.6.23 is not in the repositories
yet.
So basically the question is this. Can i trust the SATA300 TX4 or
should i buy a Highpoint RocketRAID 1640/1740?. I can order such device
online but i need to be sure that it works correctly :(
--
Best regards,
MisterE mailto:MisterE2002@zonnet.nl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 7:26 Re[2]: Sata Sil3512 bug? Mikael Pettersson
2007-10-03 8:31 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-03 14:45 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-03 14:50 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-14 12:07 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-15 8:44 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-17 12:39 ` MisterE [this message]
2007-10-17 12:54 ` Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4 Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-17 15:04 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-17 19:21 ` Peter Favrholdt
2007-10-19 12:02 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-18 21:07 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-19 1:26 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-19 21:06 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-19 22:58 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-19 23:58 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-20 21:50 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 13:24 ` [PATCH-RFC] (was: Re: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4) Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 13:44 ` [PATCH-RFC] Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 14:08 ` Re[2]: [PATCH-RFC] MisterE
2007-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH-RFC] Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 15:16 ` [PATCH-RFC] Promise TX4 implement hw-bug workaround Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-27 18:18 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 18:37 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 8:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-28 20:03 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 10:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-28 11:52 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 11:10 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=135469746.20071017143929@zonnet.nl \
--to=mistere2002@zonnet.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.orglinux-ide \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=screwdriver@lxnt.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.