All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Sabourenkov <screwdriver@lxnt.info>
To: MisterE <MisterE2002@zonnet.nl>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
	htejun@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sata Sil3512 bug?
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:44:01 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47132851.5050409@lxnt.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398538486.20071014140703@zonnet.nl>

MisterE wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Alexander, does these problems with the Promise SATA300 TX4 happen to
> everyone?
> 

Most probably not, as I think it would have been fixed much faster then.

I was waiting for a) release of 2.6.23, and b) me completing the move to 
another flat
to retest all the latest developments in mainline and libata-dev.

With a) done and b) almost done, I'll retest and report any issues quite 
soon.

Besides, there is a report of TX4 and 2.6.23 not showing problems that 
were there with 2.6.22,
( see "Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond, 
reset failed" thread).


> The only alternatives are
> using soft-raid products as normal controllers. Does anyone have experiences
> with the following products?
> * Highpoint RocketRAID 1640 (150 MB/s)
> * Highpoint RocketRAID 1740 (300 MB/s)
> * Adaptec 1210SA
> 

For any kind of non-hobby task I'd skip trying to build a disk array to 
buying a SATA-SCSI/SATA-iSCSI box.
While I had many mind-boggling issues with various combinations of SATA 
HDDs, onboard and standalone
controllers, Promise and Infortrend disk arrays worked quite reliably.

-- 

./lxnt

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-15  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-03  7:26 Re[2]: Sata Sil3512 bug? Mikael Pettersson
2007-10-03  8:31 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-03 14:45   ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-03 14:50     ` Alan Cox
2007-10-14 12:07   ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-15  8:44     ` Alexander Sabourenkov [this message]
2007-10-17 12:39   ` Re[2]: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4 MisterE
2007-10-17 12:54     ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-17 15:04       ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-17 19:21         ` Peter Favrholdt
2007-10-19 12:02           ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-18 21:07         ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-19  1:26           ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-19 21:06             ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-19 22:58               ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-19 23:58               ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-20 21:50                 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 13:24                   ` [PATCH-RFC] (was: Re: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4) Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 13:44                     ` [PATCH-RFC] Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 14:08                       ` Re[2]: [PATCH-RFC] MisterE
2007-10-27 15:09                         ` [PATCH-RFC] Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 15:16                       ` [PATCH-RFC] Promise TX4 implement hw-bug workaround Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 18:09                         ` Alan Cox
2007-10-27 18:18                           ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 18:37                             ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28  8:21                             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-28 20:03                               ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 10:29                         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-28 11:52                           ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 11:10                             ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-04  0:46 Sata Sil3512 bug? Richard Scobie
2007-09-27 13:51 MisterE
2007-09-28 12:25 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-28 15:25   ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-09-28 15:51     ` Alan Cox
2007-09-28 16:55       ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-02 19:20         ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-04  1:27           ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-13 16:36             ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-18  3:29               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47132851.5050409@lxnt.info \
    --to=screwdriver@lxnt.info \
    --cc=MisterE2002@zonnet.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.