From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org, luto@amacapital.net, xemul@parallels.com,
gorcunov@openvz.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add 32 bit VDSO support for 32 and 64 bit kernels
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355849558.26967.24.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D09733.3080502@zytor.com>
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2012, 08:17 -0800 schrieb H. Peter Anvin:
> On 12/18/2012 01:40 AM, stefani@seibold.net wrote:
> > From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> >
> > This patch adds support for 32 bit VDSO.
> >
> > For 32 bit programs running on a 32 bit kernel, the same mechanism is
> > used as for 64 bit programs running on a 64 bit kernel.
> >
> > For 32 bit programs running under a 64 bit IA32_EMULATION, it is a
> > little bit more tricky. In this case the VVAR and HPET will be mapped
> > into the 32 bit address space, by cutting of the upper 32 bit. So the
> > address for this will not changed in the view of the 32 bit VDSO. The
> > HPET will be mapped in this case at 0xff5fe000 and the VVAR at 0xff5ff000.
> >
> > The transformation between the in 64 bit kernel representation and the 32 bit
> > abi will be also provided.
> >
> > So we have one VDSO Source for all.
> >
>
> You seem to once again have disregarded the request to make the vvar and
> hpet part of the vdso address space proper. If this is not possible or
> highly impractical, please extend a technical motivation why that is so,
> rather than simply ignoring it.
>
Pardon, i never disregarded nor i have agreed that this is going to be a
part of the VDSO. I currently have also no idea how to do this and i see
no need at the moment to do this revamp. The 64 bit VDSO lives since
more than 6 years with this kind of implementation.
You asked me to do the VDSO 32 bit stuff for the IA32_EMULATION, before
it is ready for inclusion into the kernel. Thats exactly what i did. I
spend the whole weekend of my spare time to do this implementation. Now
we have them all.
The patch works perfectly, all issues are solved:
- Calling conventions
- ABI transformations
- System call gateway for X86 32 bit
- Mapping of the FIXMAP and HPET into the lower 32 bit address space for
IA32_EMULATION
- Support for 32 bit programs in 32 kernel and 64 bit kernel
- One VDSO source for all
If you prefer an other solutions, its okay. There are many ways to code
things. But for now i think it is a good step ahead. That is what i
currently can provide.
- Stefani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-18 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 9:40 [PATCH 0/6] Add 32 bit VDSO time function support stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] Move out seqcount from seqlock.h stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] Make vsyscall_gtod_data handling x86 generic stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] Make vsyscall_gtod_data compatible with 32 bit VDSO stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] Add new base function _install_special_mapping() to mmap.c stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] Cleanup header files to build a proper 32 bit VDSO stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] Add 32 bit VDSO support for 32 and 64 bit kernels stefani
2012-12-18 16:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-18 16:52 ` Stefani Seibold [this message]
2012-12-18 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-18 20:32 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-18 20:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-18 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 7:41 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-20 16:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 17:53 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-20 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 18:23 ` H.J. Lu
2012-12-20 18:35 ` Roland McGrath
2012-12-20 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1355849558.26967.24.camel@wall-e \
--to=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.