From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@google.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org, xemul@parallels.com, gorcunov@openvz.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
jakub@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add 32 bit VDSO support for 32 and 64 bit kernels
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:40:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D35BBB.7020905@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=4xhpXojoeNdThEQi3CH_fhsAqk63_G5zYgMTvoPxn5nE7Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/20/2012 10:35 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The Kconfig text for COMPAT_VDSO suggests that glibc versions prior to
> 2.3.3 may have relied on the fixed address. I can't find anything in the
> libc revision history to explain that (AFAIK the code always used
> AT_SYSINFO* since it started using the vDSO at all), but it might have been
> something less obvious. Someone like Jakub might recall the details.
Jakub, any insights?
We're trying to figure out if anything ever depended on the COMPAT_VDSO
(at a fixed address), in particular for i386 (as opposed to x86-64).
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-20 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 9:40 [PATCH 0/6] Add 32 bit VDSO time function support stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] Move out seqcount from seqlock.h stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] Make vsyscall_gtod_data handling x86 generic stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] Make vsyscall_gtod_data compatible with 32 bit VDSO stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] Add new base function _install_special_mapping() to mmap.c stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] Cleanup header files to build a proper 32 bit VDSO stefani
2012-12-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] Add 32 bit VDSO support for 32 and 64 bit kernels stefani
2012-12-18 16:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-18 16:52 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-18 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-18 20:32 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-18 20:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-12-18 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 7:41 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-20 16:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 17:53 ` Stefani Seibold
2012-12-20 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-20 18:23 ` H.J. Lu
2012-12-20 18:35 ` Roland McGrath
2012-12-20 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D35BBB.7020905@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrathr@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.