From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
paul@pwsan.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lib: atomic64: Initialize locks statically to fix early users
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:39:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355989188-17665-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D2B94D.10309@codeaurora.org>
The atomic64 library uses a handful of static spin locks to
implement atomic 64-bit operations on architectures without
support for atomic 64-bit instructions. Unfortunately, the
spinlocks are initialized in a pure initcall and that is too late
for the vfs namespace code which wants to use atomic64 operations
before the initcall is run (introduced by 8823c07 "vfs: Add setns
support for the mount namespace").
This leads to BUG messages such as:
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0/0
lock: atomic64_lock+0x240/0x400, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
[<c001af64>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c02c2010>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x158/0x198)
[<c02c2010>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x158/0x198) from [<c04d89ec>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58)
[<c04d89ec>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c02cabf0>] (atomic64_add_return+0x30/0x5c)
[<c02cabf0>] (atomic64_add_return+0x30/0x5c) from [<c0124564>] (alloc_mnt_ns.clone.14+0x44/0xac)
[<c0124564>] (alloc_mnt_ns.clone.14+0x44/0xac) from [<c0124f4c>] (create_mnt_ns+0xc/0x54)
[<c0124f4c>] (create_mnt_ns+0xc/0x54) from [<c06f31a4>] (mnt_init+0x120/0x1d4)
[<c06f31a4>] (mnt_init+0x120/0x1d4) from [<c06f2d50>] (vfs_caches_init+0xe0/0x10c)
[<c06f2d50>] (vfs_caches_init+0xe0/0x10c) from [<c06d4798>] (start_kernel+0x29c/0x300)
[<c06d4798>] (start_kernel+0x29c/0x300) from [<80008078>] (0x80008078)
coming out early on during boot when spinlock debugging is enabled.
Fix this problem by initializing the spinlocks statically at
compile time.
Reported-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Tested-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
Sorry Andrew, I couldn't find a maintainer of this file so I
am picking on you.
lib/atomic64.c | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/atomic64.c b/lib/atomic64.c
index 9785378..08a4f06 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64.c
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@
static union {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
char pad[L1_CACHE_BYTES];
-} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
+ [0 ... (NR_LOCKS - 1)] = {
+ .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(atomic64_lock.lock),
+ },
+};
static inline raw_spinlock_t *lock_addr(const atomic64_t *v)
{
@@ -173,14 +177,3 @@ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u)
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic64_add_unless);
-
-static int init_atomic64_lock(void)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; ++i)
- raw_spin_lock_init(&atomic64_lock[i].lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
-pure_initcall(init_atomic64_lock);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib: atomic64: Initialize locks statically to fix early users
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:39:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355989188-17665-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D2B94D.10309@codeaurora.org>
The atomic64 library uses a handful of static spin locks to
implement atomic 64-bit operations on architectures without
support for atomic 64-bit instructions. Unfortunately, the
spinlocks are initialized in a pure initcall and that is too late
for the vfs namespace code which wants to use atomic64 operations
before the initcall is run (introduced by 8823c07 "vfs: Add setns
support for the mount namespace").
This leads to BUG messages such as:
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0/0
lock: atomic64_lock+0x240/0x400, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
[<c001af64>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c02c2010>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x158/0x198)
[<c02c2010>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x158/0x198) from [<c04d89ec>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58)
[<c04d89ec>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c02cabf0>] (atomic64_add_return+0x30/0x5c)
[<c02cabf0>] (atomic64_add_return+0x30/0x5c) from [<c0124564>] (alloc_mnt_ns.clone.14+0x44/0xac)
[<c0124564>] (alloc_mnt_ns.clone.14+0x44/0xac) from [<c0124f4c>] (create_mnt_ns+0xc/0x54)
[<c0124f4c>] (create_mnt_ns+0xc/0x54) from [<c06f31a4>] (mnt_init+0x120/0x1d4)
[<c06f31a4>] (mnt_init+0x120/0x1d4) from [<c06f2d50>] (vfs_caches_init+0xe0/0x10c)
[<c06f2d50>] (vfs_caches_init+0xe0/0x10c) from [<c06d4798>] (start_kernel+0x29c/0x300)
[<c06d4798>] (start_kernel+0x29c/0x300) from [<80008078>] (0x80008078)
coming out early on during boot when spinlock debugging is enabled.
Fix this problem by initializing the spinlocks statically at
compile time.
Reported-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Tested-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
Sorry Andrew, I couldn't find a maintainer of this file so I
am picking on you.
lib/atomic64.c | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/atomic64.c b/lib/atomic64.c
index 9785378..08a4f06 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64.c
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@
static union {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
char pad[L1_CACHE_BYTES];
-} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
+ [0 ... (NR_LOCKS - 1)] = {
+ .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(atomic64_lock.lock),
+ },
+};
static inline raw_spinlock_t *lock_addr(const atomic64_t *v)
{
@@ -173,14 +177,3 @@ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u)
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic64_add_unless);
-
-static int init_atomic64_lock(void)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; ++i)
- raw_spin_lock_init(&atomic64_lock[i].lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
-pure_initcall(init_atomic64_lock);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-20 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 11:05 BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-19 11:05 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-19 16:53 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-12-19 16:53 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-12-19 20:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-19 20:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-20 4:48 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-20 4:48 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-20 6:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-20 6:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-20 6:44 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-20 6:44 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-20 7:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-20 7:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-12-20 7:39 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2012-12-20 7:39 ` [PATCH] lib: atomic64: Initialize locks statically to fix early users Stephen Boyd
2012-12-20 19:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-20 19:06 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1355989188-17665-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.