From: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare uretprobe
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:24:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357730692-3928-4-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357730692-3928-1-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com>
When a uprobe with return consumer is hit, prepare_uretprobe function is
invoked. It creates return_instance, hijacks return address and replaces
it with the trampoline.
v2:
get rid of ->return_consumers
todo:
protect uprobe
Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 4 ++++
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index bddfad6..cdc4d53 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ struct uprobe_task {
enum uprobe_task_state state;
struct arch_uprobe_task autask;
+ /*
+ * list for tracking uprobes with return consumers
+ */
+ struct hlist_head return_uprobes;
struct uprobe *active_uprobe;
unsigned long xol_vaddr;
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 0ad2ac3..d6fa497 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -74,6 +74,12 @@ struct uprobe {
struct arch_uprobe arch;
};
+struct return_uprobe_i {
+ struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ struct hlist_node hlist; /* node in list */
+ unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr; /* original return address */
+};
+
/*
* valid_vma: Verify if the specified vma is an executable vma
* Relax restrictions while unregistering: vm_flags might have
@@ -1327,11 +1333,44 @@ void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t)
*/
static struct uprobe_task *get_utask(void)
{
- if (!current->utask)
+ if (!current->utask) {
current->utask = kzalloc(sizeof(struct uprobe_task), GFP_KERNEL);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(¤t->utask->return_uprobes);
+ }
return current->utask;
}
+static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct return_uprobe_i *ri;
+ struct uprobe_task *utask;
+ struct xol_area *area;
+ unsigned long rp_trampoline_vaddr = 0;
+
+ area = get_xol_area();
+ if (area)
+ rp_trampoline_vaddr = area->rp_trampoline_vaddr;
+ if (!rp_trampoline_vaddr) {
+ rp_trampoline_vaddr = xol_get_trampoline_slot();
+ if (!rp_trampoline_vaddr)
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ri = (struct return_uprobe_i *)kzalloc(sizeof(struct return_uprobe_i),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ri)
+ return;
+
+ utask = get_utask();
+ ri->orig_ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(rp_trampoline_vaddr, regs);
+ if (likely(ri->orig_ret_vaddr)) {
+ ri->uprobe = uprobe;
+ INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ri->hlist);
+ hlist_add_head(&ri->hlist, &utask->return_uprobes);
+ } else
+ kfree(ri);
+}
+
/* Prepare to single-step probed instruction out of line. */
static int
pre_ssout(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long bp_vaddr)
@@ -1485,12 +1524,17 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ int rc = 0;
struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
int remove = UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
- int rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
+ if (uc->handler)
+ rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
+
+ if (uc->rp_handler)
+ prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs); /* put bp at return */
WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK,
"bad rc=0x%x from %pf()\n", rc, uc->handler);
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-09 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 11:24 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] uprobes: return probe implementation Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] uretprobes/x86: hijack return address Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] uretprobes: trampoline implementation Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` Anton Arapov [this message]
2013-01-09 16:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare uretprobe Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-10 11:44 ` Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] uretprobes: invoke return probe handlers Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-10 11:42 ` Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] uprobes: return probe implementation Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357730692-3928-4-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com \
--to=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.