From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare uretprobe
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:17:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130109161701.GC27722@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357730692-3928-4-git-send-email-anton@redhat.com>
On 01/09, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
> todo:
> protect uprobe
Yep ;)
> static struct uprobe_task *get_utask(void)
> {
> - if (!current->utask)
> + if (!current->utask) {
> current->utask = kzalloc(sizeof(struct uprobe_task), GFP_KERNEL);
> + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(¤t->utask->return_uprobes);
What if kzalloc() fails?
> +static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct return_uprobe_i *ri;
> + struct uprobe_task *utask;
> + struct xol_area *area;
> + unsigned long rp_trampoline_vaddr = 0;
> +
> + area = get_xol_area();
> + if (area)
> + rp_trampoline_vaddr = area->rp_trampoline_vaddr;
> + if (!rp_trampoline_vaddr) {
> + rp_trampoline_vaddr = xol_get_trampoline_slot();
This is obviously racy. But again, so far I think we can simply remove
this.
> static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + int rc = 0;
> struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
> int remove = UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
>
> down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
> - int rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
> + if (uc->handler)
> + rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
> +
> + if (uc->rp_handler)
> + prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs); /* put bp at return */
This doesn't look right. prepare_uretprobe() should not be called
multiple times.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-09 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 11:24 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] uprobes: return probe implementation Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] uretprobes/x86: hijack return address Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] uretprobes: trampoline implementation Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare uretprobe Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:17 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-01-10 11:44 ` Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] uretprobes: invoke return probe handlers Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-01-10 11:42 ` Anton Arapov
2013-01-09 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] uprobes: return probe implementation Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130109161701.GC27722@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.