From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->cpu to worker_pool
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358386969-945-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358386969-945-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Move gcwq->cpu to pool->cpu. This introduces a couple places where
gcwq->pools[0].cpu is used. These will soon go away as gcwq is
further reduced.
This is part of an effort to remove global_cwq and make worker_pool
the top level abstraction, which in turn will help implementing worker
pools with user-specified attributes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 2 +-
kernel/workqueue.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
index f28d1b6..4e798e3 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_queue_work,
__entry->function = work->func;
__entry->workqueue = cwq->wq;
__entry->req_cpu = req_cpu;
- __entry->cpu = cwq->pool->gcwq->cpu;
+ __entry->cpu = cwq->pool->cpu;
),
TP_printk("work struct=%p function=%pf workqueue=%p req_cpu=%u cpu=%u",
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 092d14aa..1720da7 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct worker {
struct worker_pool {
struct global_cwq *gcwq; /* I: the owning gcwq */
+ unsigned int cpu; /* I: the associated cpu */
int id; /* I: pool ID */
unsigned int flags; /* X: flags */
@@ -179,7 +180,6 @@ struct worker_pool {
*/
struct global_cwq {
spinlock_t lock; /* the gcwq lock */
- unsigned int cpu; /* I: the associated cpu */
struct worker_pool pools[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS];
/* normal and highpri pools */
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *worker_pool_by_id(int pool_id)
static atomic_t *get_pool_nr_running(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
- int cpu = pool->gcwq->cpu;
+ int cpu = pool->cpu;
int idx = std_worker_pool_pri(pool);
if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ void wq_worker_waking_up(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int cpu)
struct worker *worker = kthread_data(task);
if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->pool->gcwq->cpu != cpu);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(worker->pool->cpu != cpu);
atomic_inc(get_pool_nr_running(worker->pool));
}
}
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
}
/* gcwq determined, get cwq and queue */
- cwq = get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq);
+ cwq = get_cwq(gcwq->pools[0].cpu, wq);
trace_workqueue_queue_work(req_cpu, cwq, work);
if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry))) {
@@ -1404,20 +1404,20 @@ static void __queue_delayed_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
/*
* This stores cwq for the moment, for the timer_fn. Note that the
- * work's gcwq is preserved to allow reentrance detection for
+ * work's pool is preserved to allow reentrance detection for
* delayed works.
*/
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_work_gcwq(work);
+ struct worker_pool *pool = get_work_pool(work);
/*
- * If we cannot get the last gcwq from @work directly,
+ * If we cannot get the last pool from @work directly,
* select the last CPU such that it avoids unnecessarily
* triggering non-reentrancy check in __queue_work().
*/
lcpu = cpu;
- if (gcwq)
- lcpu = gcwq->cpu;
+ if (pool)
+ lcpu = pool->cpu;
if (lcpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
lcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
} else {
@@ -1638,14 +1638,14 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
* against POOL_DISASSOCIATED.
*/
if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED))
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu));
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu));
spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
return false;
- if (task_cpu(task) == gcwq->cpu &&
+ if (task_cpu(task) == pool->cpu &&
cpumask_equal(¤t->cpus_allowed,
- get_cpu_mask(gcwq->cpu)))
+ get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu)))
return true;
spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
@@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
else
wq = system_wq;
- insert_work(get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq), rebind_work,
+ insert_work(get_cwq(pool->cpu, wq), rebind_work,
worker->scheduled.next,
work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR));
}
@@ -1825,10 +1825,10 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
worker->pool = pool;
worker->id = id;
- if (gcwq->cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+ if (pool->cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
worker->task = kthread_create_on_node(worker_thread,
- worker, cpu_to_node(gcwq->cpu),
- "kworker/%u:%d%s", gcwq->cpu, id, pri);
+ worker, cpu_to_node(pool->cpu),
+ "kworker/%u:%d%s", pool->cpu, id, pri);
else
worker->task = kthread_create(worker_thread, worker,
"kworker/u:%d%s", id, pri);
@@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
* online, make sure every worker has %PF_THREAD_BOUND set.
*/
if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)) {
- kthread_bind(worker->task, gcwq->cpu);
+ kthread_bind(worker->task, pool->cpu);
} else {
worker->task->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
@@ -1955,7 +1955,7 @@ static bool send_mayday(struct work_struct *work)
return false;
/* mayday mayday mayday */
- cpu = cwq->pool->gcwq->cpu;
+ cpu = cwq->pool->cpu;
/* WORK_CPU_UNBOUND can't be set in cpumask, use cpu 0 instead */
if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
cpu = 0;
@@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(worker->flags & WORKER_UNBOUND) &&
!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) &&
- raw_smp_processor_id() != gcwq->cpu);
+ raw_smp_processor_id() != pool->cpu);
/*
* A single work shouldn't be executed concurrently by
@@ -3562,7 +3562,7 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
struct hlist_node *pos;
int i;
- BUG_ON(gcwq->cpu != smp_processor_id());
+ BUG_ON(gcwq->pools[0].cpu != smp_processor_id());
gcwq_claim_assoc_and_lock(gcwq);
@@ -3869,10 +3869,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
struct worker_pool *pool;
spin_lock_init(&gcwq->lock);
- gcwq->cpu = cpu;
for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
pool->gcwq = gcwq;
+ pool->cpu = cpu;
pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->worklist);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->idle_list);
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 1:42 [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 01/17] workqueue: unexport work_cpu() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] workqueue: use std_ prefix for the standard per-cpu pools Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 03/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED a pool flag Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 04/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_FREEZING " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 05/17] workqueue: introduce WORK_OFFQ_CPU_NONE Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 06/17] workqueue: add worker_pool->id Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 07/17] workqueue: record pool ID instead of CPU in work->data when off-queue Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 08/17] workqueue: move busy_hash from global_cwq to worker_pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 10/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->lock " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 11/17] workqueue: make hotplug processing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 12/17] workqueue: make freezing/thawing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 13/17] workqueue: replace for_each_worker_pool() with for_each_std_worker_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 14/17] workqueue: remove worker_pool->gcwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 15/17] workqueue: remove global_cwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-22 6:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 1:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-23 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 9:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-24 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 16/17] workqueue: rename nr_running variables Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 17/17] workqueue: post global_cwq removal cleanups Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:48 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 3:25 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-17 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-22 5:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 1:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 13:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-24 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358386969-945-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.