From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 17/17] workqueue: post global_cwq removal cleanups
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358386969-945-18-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358386969-945-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Remove remaining references to gcwq.
* __next_gcwq_cpu() steals __next_wq_cpu() name. The original
__next_wq_cpu() became __next_cwq_cpu().
* s/for_each_gcwq_cpu/for_each_wq_cpu/
s/for_each_online_gcwq_cpu/for_each_online_wq_cpu/
* s/gcwq_mayday_timeout/pool_mayday_timeout/
* s/gcwq_unbind_fn/wq_unbind_fn/
* Drop references to gcwq in comments.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 52ca95b..7507609 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -272,8 +272,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_freezable_wq);
#define for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, pool) \
hash_for_each(pool->busy_hash, i, pos, worker, hentry)
-static inline int __next_gcwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
- unsigned int sw)
+static inline int __next_wq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
+ unsigned int sw)
{
if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
if (sw & 1) {
@@ -287,39 +287,39 @@ static inline int __next_gcwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
return WORK_CPU_NONE;
}
-static inline int __next_wq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
- struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+static inline int __next_cwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
- return __next_gcwq_cpu(cpu, mask, !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ? 1 : 2);
+ return __next_wq_cpu(cpu, mask, !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ? 1 : 2);
}
/*
* CPU iterators
*
- * An extra gcwq is defined for an invalid cpu number
+ * An extra cpu number is defined using an invalid cpu number
* (WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) to host workqueues which are not bound to any
- * specific CPU. The following iterators are similar to
- * for_each_*_cpu() iterators but also considers the unbound gcwq.
+ * specific CPU. The following iterators are similar to for_each_*_cpu()
+ * iterators but also considers the unbound CPU.
*
- * for_each_gcwq_cpu() : possible CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
- * for_each_online_gcwq_cpu() : online CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
+ * for_each_wq_cpu() : possible CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
+ * for_each_online_wq_cpu() : online CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
* for_each_cwq_cpu() : possible CPUs for bound workqueues,
* WORK_CPU_UNBOUND for unbound workqueues
*/
-#define for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) \
- for ((cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, 3); \
+#define for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) \
+ for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, 3); \
(cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
- (cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, 3))
+ (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, 3))
-#define for_each_online_gcwq_cpu(cpu) \
- for ((cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu(-1, cpu_online_mask, 3); \
+#define for_each_online_wq_cpu(cpu) \
+ for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_online_mask, 3); \
(cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
- (cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask, 3))
+ (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask, 3))
#define for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq) \
- for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, (wq)); \
+ for ((cpu) = __next_cwq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, (wq)); \
(cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
- (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, (wq)))
+ (cpu) = __next_cwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, (wq)))
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static bool __need_more_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
* running workers.
*
* Note that, because unbound workers never contribute to nr_running, this
- * function will always return %true for unbound gcwq as long as the
+ * function will always return %true for unbound pools as long as the
* worklist isn't empty.
*/
static bool need_more_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
@@ -1147,14 +1147,14 @@ fail:
}
/**
- * insert_work - insert a work into gcwq
+ * insert_work - insert a work into a pool
* @cwq: cwq @work belongs to
* @work: work to insert
* @head: insertion point
* @extra_flags: extra WORK_STRUCT_* flags to set
*
- * Insert @work which belongs to @cwq into @gcwq after @head.
- * @extra_flags is or'd to work_struct flags.
+ * Insert @work which belongs to @cwq after @head. @extra_flags is or'd to
+ * work_struct flags.
*
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
@@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int cpu;
- for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
struct worker_pool *pool = cwq->pool;
struct worker *worker;
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, jiffies + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT);
/*
- * Sanity check nr_running. Because gcwq_unbind_fn() releases
+ * Sanity check nr_running. Because wq_unbind_fn() releases
* pool->lock between setting %WORKER_UNBOUND and zapping
* nr_running, the warning may trigger spuriously. Check iff
* unbind is not in progress.
@@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
}
/**
- * worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - bind worker to its cpu if possible and lock gcwq
+ * worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - bind worker to its cpu if possible and lock pool
* @worker: self
*
* Works which are scheduled while the cpu is online must at least be
@@ -1593,10 +1593,10 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
* themselves to the target cpu and may race with cpu going down or
* coming online. kthread_bind() can't be used because it may put the
* worker to already dead cpu and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() can't be used
- * verbatim as it's best effort and blocking and gcwq may be
+ * verbatim as it's best effort and blocking and pool may be
* [dis]associated in the meantime.
*
- * This function tries set_cpus_allowed() and locks gcwq and verifies the
+ * This function tries set_cpus_allowed() and locks pool and verifies the
* binding against %POOL_DISASSOCIATED which is set during
* %CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and cleared during %CPU_ONLINE, so if the worker
* enters idle state or fetches works without dropping lock, it can
@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
* held.
*
* RETURNS:
- * %true if the associated gcwq is online (@worker is successfully
+ * %true if the associated pool is online (@worker is successfully
* bound), %false if offline.
*/
static bool worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(struct worker *worker)
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ fail:
* start_worker - start a newly created worker
* @worker: worker to start
*
- * Make the gcwq aware of @worker and start it.
+ * Make the pool aware of @worker and start it.
*
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
* destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
* @worker: worker to be destroyed
*
- * Destroy @worker and adjust @gcwq stats accordingly.
+ * Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly.
*
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which is released and regrabbed.
@@ -1937,7 +1937,7 @@ static bool send_mayday(struct work_struct *work)
return true;
}
-static void gcwq_mayday_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
+static void pool_mayday_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
{
struct worker_pool *pool = (void *)__pool;
struct work_struct *work;
@@ -2065,9 +2065,9 @@ static bool maybe_destroy_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
* manage_workers - manage worker pool
* @worker: self
*
- * Assume the manager role and manage gcwq worker pool @worker belongs
+ * Assume the manager role and manage the worker pool @worker belongs
* to. At any given time, there can be only zero or one manager per
- * gcwq. The exclusion is handled automatically by this function.
+ * pool. The exclusion is handled automatically by this function.
*
* The caller can safely start processing works on false return. On
* true return, it's guaranteed that need_to_create_worker() is false
@@ -2110,11 +2110,11 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
* CPU hotplug could have happened while we were waiting
* for assoc_mutex. Hotplug itself can't handle us
* because manager isn't either on idle or busy list, and
- * @gcwq's state and ours could have deviated.
+ * @pool's state and ours could have deviated.
*
* As hotplug is now excluded via assoc_mutex, we can
* simply try to bind. It will succeed or fail depending
- * on @gcwq's current state. Try it and adjust
+ * on @pool's current state. Try it and adjust
* %WORKER_UNBOUND accordingly.
*/
if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker))
@@ -2289,8 +2289,8 @@ static void process_scheduled_works(struct worker *worker)
* worker_thread - the worker thread function
* @__worker: self
*
- * The gcwq worker thread function. There's a single dynamic pool of
- * these per each cpu. These workers process all works regardless of
+ * The worker thread function. There are NR_CPU_WORKER_POOLS dynamic pools
+ * of these per each cpu. These workers process all works regardless of
* their specific target workqueue. The only exception is works which
* belong to workqueues with a rescuer which will be explained in
* rescuer_thread().
@@ -2386,14 +2386,14 @@ sleep:
* Workqueue rescuer thread function. There's one rescuer for each
* workqueue which has WQ_RESCUER set.
*
- * Regular work processing on a gcwq may block trying to create a new
+ * Regular work processing on a pool may block trying to create a new
* worker which uses GFP_KERNEL allocation which has slight chance of
* developing into deadlock if some works currently on the same queue
* need to be processed to satisfy the GFP_KERNEL allocation. This is
* the problem rescuer solves.
*
- * When such condition is possible, the gcwq summons rescuers of all
- * workqueues which have works queued on the gcwq and let them process
+ * When such condition is possible, the pool summons rescuers of all
+ * workqueues which have works queued on the pool and let them process
* those works so that forward progress can be guaranteed.
*
* This should happen rarely.
@@ -3484,7 +3484,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy);
*
* There are two challenges in supporting CPU hotplug. Firstly, there
* are a lot of assumptions on strong associations among work, cwq and
- * gcwq which make migrating pending and scheduled works very
+ * pool which make migrating pending and scheduled works very
* difficult to implement without impacting hot paths. Secondly,
* worker pools serve mix of short, long and very long running works making
* blocked draining impractical.
@@ -3494,7 +3494,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy);
* cpu comes back online.
*/
-static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct worker_pool *pool;
@@ -3609,7 +3609,7 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
/* unbinding should happen on the local CPU */
- INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, gcwq_unbind_fn);
+ INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, wq_unbind_fn);
queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq, &unbind_work);
flush_work(&unbind_work);
break;
@@ -3662,7 +3662,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
*
* Start freezing workqueues. After this function returns, all freezable
* workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works list instead of
- * gcwq->worklist.
+ * pool->worklist.
*
* CONTEXT:
* Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and pool->lock's.
@@ -3676,7 +3676,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
BUG_ON(workqueue_freezing);
workqueue_freezing = true;
- for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
@@ -3723,7 +3723,7 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
BUG_ON(!workqueue_freezing);
- for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
/*
* nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe
@@ -3751,7 +3751,7 @@ out_unlock:
* thaw_workqueues - thaw workqueues
*
* Thaw workqueues. Normal queueing is restored and all collected
- * frozen works are transferred to their respective gcwq worklists.
+ * frozen works are transferred to their respective pool worklists.
*
* CONTEXT:
* Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and pool->lock's.
@@ -3765,7 +3765,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
if (!workqueue_freezing)
goto out_unlock;
- for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
@@ -3809,8 +3809,8 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
cpu_notifier(workqueue_cpu_up_callback, CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_UP);
hotcpu_notifier(workqueue_cpu_down_callback, CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_DOWN);
- /* initialize gcwqs */
- for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
+ /* initialize CPU pools */
+ for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
@@ -3825,7 +3825,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
pool->idle_timer.function = idle_worker_timeout;
pool->idle_timer.data = (unsigned long)pool;
- setup_timer(&pool->mayday_timer, gcwq_mayday_timeout,
+ setup_timer(&pool->mayday_timer, pool_mayday_timeout,
(unsigned long)pool);
mutex_init(&pool->assoc_mutex);
@@ -3837,7 +3837,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
}
/* create the initial worker */
- for_each_online_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_online_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 1:42 [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 01/17] workqueue: unexport work_cpu() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] workqueue: use std_ prefix for the standard per-cpu pools Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 03/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED a pool flag Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 04/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_FREEZING " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 05/17] workqueue: introduce WORK_OFFQ_CPU_NONE Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 06/17] workqueue: add worker_pool->id Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 07/17] workqueue: record pool ID instead of CPU in work->data when off-queue Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 08/17] workqueue: move busy_hash from global_cwq to worker_pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 09/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->cpu " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 10/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->lock " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 11/17] workqueue: make hotplug processing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 12/17] workqueue: make freezing/thawing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 13/17] workqueue: replace for_each_worker_pool() with for_each_std_worker_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 14/17] workqueue: remove worker_pool->gcwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 15/17] workqueue: remove global_cwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-22 6:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 1:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-23 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 9:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-24 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 16/17] workqueue: rename nr_running variables Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-01-17 1:48 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 3:25 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-17 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-22 5:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 1:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 13:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-24 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358386969-945-18-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.