Re: hg fetcher failures for SRCREV set to a tag

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:36 -0500, Jon Szymaniak wrote:
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> Thanks for pinging back on this. (Sorry I just double-sent this to
> >> you. Forgot to include the list! :P)
> >>
> >> I think a fairly simple solution might be to just clone the entire
> >> repo by not adding "-r REV" to options[] for an 'hg clone' invocation.
> >> The 'hg update' that follows on lines 142-147 should set the repo to
> >> the desired revision.
> >
> >
> > This does sound like the best bet, to me.
> > --
> > Christopher Larson
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just wanted to touch base on this issue. I didn't hear anything back
> on the little patch I posted...not sure if that's a silent rejection,
> if I didn't include the right info in the subject line, or if folks
> haven't had a chance to test it. If there's something I screwed up,
> please do let me know for future reference. :)
> 
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/2012-December/003962.html

Sorry about the delay, vacation and lots of other distractions. The
patch was find and I've merged it now, thanks. I did have trouble
applying it as it appeared the whitespace was messed up. I fixed it up
manually this time though.

Cheers,

Richard