From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:14:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363990490.24790.12@snotra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363949917.8238.25.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (from johannes@sipsolutions.net on Fri Mar 22 05:58:37 2013)
On 03/22/2013 05:58:37 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:16 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>=20
> > > > I wonder about kernel modules, though flushing 32 MiB wouldn't =20
> be
> > > > adequate there.
> > >
> > > Good question, but would they be running? You have to have =20
> everything
> > > built in that you need to load the image? Or maybe not, with the
> > > userspace image restoration that became possible at some point...
> >
> > Is that all that's being restored in this step, or would we be =20
> loading
> > all modules that were loaded before suspend (as they're normally not
> > swappable)? I'm not too familiar with what gets saved where.
>=20
> Yes, they would be restored since full memory is restored, but the
> kernel doing the restore hasn't typically had a chance to load =20
> modules.
> Although with uswsusp there probably are ways it can already have.
If we're loading executable code that wasn't there before[1], we need =20
to flush -- but there's no reason why modules would only be in the =20
lower 32 MiB.
-Scott
[1] within the resume process, not before suspend=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-22 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 3:36 [PATCH] powerpc: add Book E support to 64-bit hibernation Wang Dongsheng
2013-03-14 8:37 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-14 16:52 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-15 15:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-18 22:12 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-19 20:55 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-19 21:10 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-19 21:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-19 22:16 ` Scott Wood
2013-03-22 10:58 ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-22 22:14 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-04-02 5:28 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-04-03 0:34 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-03 5:36 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-04-03 20:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-04-07 3:01 ` Wang Dongsheng-B40534
2013-04-08 18:24 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363990490.24790.12@snotra \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=dongsheng.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.