From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:43:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364453020-2829-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364453020-2829-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Break init_and_link_pwq() into init_pwq() and link_pwq() and move
unbound-workqueue specific handling into apply_workqueue_attrs().
Also, factor out unbound pool and pool_workqueue allocation into
alloc_unbound_pwq().
This reorganization is to prepare for NUMA affinity and doesn't
introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5b53705..58c7663 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3626,13 +3626,10 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
-static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
- struct workqueue_struct *wq,
- struct worker_pool *pool,
- struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
+static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ struct worker_pool *pool)
{
- int node;
-
BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3642,8 +3639,15 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node);
INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn);
+}
- mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+/* sync @pwq with the current state of its associated wq and link it */
+static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+ struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
/*
* Set the matching work_color. This is synchronized with
@@ -3658,14 +3662,29 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
/* link in @pwq */
list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
+}
- if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
- copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
- for_each_node(node)
- rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+/* obtain a pool matching @attr and create a pwq associating the pool and @wq */
+static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
+
+ pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
+ if (!pool)
+ return NULL;
+
+ pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pwq) {
+ put_unbound_pool(pool);
+ return NULL;
}
- mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, pool);
+ return pwq;
}
/**
@@ -3686,8 +3705,8 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs;
- struct pool_workqueue *pwq = NULL, *last_pwq;
- struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq;
+ int node;
/* only unbound workqueues can change attributes */
if (WARN_ON(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
@@ -3706,22 +3725,21 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-
- pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pwq) {
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, new_attrs);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ if (!pwq)
goto enomem;
- }
- pool = get_unbound_pool(new_attrs);
- if (!pool) {
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
- goto enomem;
- }
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ link_pwq(pwq, &last_pwq);
+
+ copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, new_attrs);
+ for_each_node(node)
+ rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
- init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, pool, &last_pwq);
if (last_pwq) {
spin_lock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
put_pwq(last_pwq);
@@ -3731,7 +3749,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
return 0;
enomem:
- kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
free_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -3752,7 +3769,11 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
- init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri], NULL);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
+
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ link_pwq(pwq, NULL);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
}
return 0;
} else {
--
1.8.1.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:43:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364453020-2829-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364453020-2829-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Break init_and_link_pwq() into init_pwq() and link_pwq() and move
unbound-workqueue specific handling into apply_workqueue_attrs().
Also, factor out unbound pool and pool_workqueue allocation into
alloc_unbound_pwq().
This reorganization is to prepare for NUMA affinity and doesn't
introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5b53705..58c7663 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3626,13 +3626,10 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
-static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
- struct workqueue_struct *wq,
- struct worker_pool *pool,
- struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
+static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ struct worker_pool *pool)
{
- int node;
-
BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3642,8 +3639,15 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node);
INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn);
+}
- mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+/* sync @pwq with the current state of its associated wq and link it */
+static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+ struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
/*
* Set the matching work_color. This is synchronized with
@@ -3658,14 +3662,29 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
/* link in @pwq */
list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
+}
- if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
- copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
- for_each_node(node)
- rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+/* obtain a pool matching @attr and create a pwq associating the pool and @wq */
+static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
+
+ pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
+ if (!pool)
+ return NULL;
+
+ pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pwq) {
+ put_unbound_pool(pool);
+ return NULL;
}
- mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, pool);
+ return pwq;
}
/**
@@ -3686,8 +3705,8 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs;
- struct pool_workqueue *pwq = NULL, *last_pwq;
- struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq;
+ int node;
/* only unbound workqueues can change attributes */
if (WARN_ON(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
@@ -3706,22 +3725,21 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-
- pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pwq) {
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, new_attrs);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ if (!pwq)
goto enomem;
- }
- pool = get_unbound_pool(new_attrs);
- if (!pool) {
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
- goto enomem;
- }
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ link_pwq(pwq, &last_pwq);
+
+ copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, new_attrs);
+ for_each_node(node)
+ rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
- init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, pool, &last_pwq);
if (last_pwq) {
spin_lock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
put_pwq(last_pwq);
@@ -3731,7 +3749,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
return 0;
enomem:
- kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
free_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -3752,7 +3769,11 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
- init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri], NULL);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
+
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ link_pwq(pwq, NULL);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
}
return 0;
} else {
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 6:43 Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 01/14] workqueue: move pwq_pool_locking outside of get/put_unbound_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 02/14] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 03/14] workqueue: drop 'H' from kworker names of unbound worker pools Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 04/14] workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 05/14] workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 06/14] workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 07/14] workqueue: move hot fields of workqueue_struct to the end Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 08/14] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 10/14] workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 11/14] workqueue: introduce numa_pwq_tbl_install() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 12/14] workqueue: introduce put_pwq_unlocked() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 13/14] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-29 22:44 ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-29 22:44 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CACvQF50c3m3eMiGKctagoOe6s3uhehfFy733imBfnLKTXSqZ4A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAOS58YOgwB4s4-2e528T6SV36pDxLS3Zx+b5eR0L2kQjiZBEnw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-30 17:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-30 17:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-31 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-31 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 " Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 14/14] workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:27 ` [PATCH 0.5/14] workqueue: fix memory leak in apply_workqueue_attrs() Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:29 ` Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364453020-2829-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.