From: "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@mail.ru>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:45:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365396351.542317232@f36.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408142124.ac540429a889cdc9800e529a@canb.auug.org.au>
Hello.
> After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c: In function 'anatop_regulator_probe':
> drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c:134:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_parent' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused by commit 5ab3a89a741f ("mfd: syscon: Add non-DT support").
>
> I have used the mfd tree from next-20130405 for today.
This means that we do not have empty declarations for the
of_xx functions in linux/of.h for !CONFIG_OF.
OK to declare these functions or any other opinions?
---
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@mail.ru>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:45:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365396351.542317232@f36.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408142124.ac540429a889cdc9800e529a@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 783 bytes --]
Hello.
> After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c: In function 'anatop_regulator_probe':
> drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c:134:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_parent' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused by commit 5ab3a89a741f ("mfd: syscon: Add non-DT support").
>
> I have used the mfd tree from next-20130405 for today.
This means that we do not have empty declarations for the
of_xx functions in linux/of.h for !CONFIG_OF.
OK to declare these functions or any other opinions?
---
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 153+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 4:21 linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-08 4:45 ` Alexander Shiyan [this message]
2013-04-08 4:45 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-08 9:22 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-04-08 16:27 ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-08 16:27 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-09 7:20 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-04-09 15:47 ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-09 15:47 ` Alexander Shiyan
2013-04-09 16:12 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-04-09 16:50 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-09 20:51 ` Samuel Ortiz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-17 13:02 Mark Brown
2025-09-26 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-29 14:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 9:51 ` Lee Jones
2025-10-01 10:29 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 12:50 ` Lee Jones
2025-10-01 17:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-04 5:41 Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-04 6:30 ` Lee Jones
2025-09-04 7:17 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-04 9:23 ` Lee Jones
2025-09-09 2:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-09 7:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-09-11 14:48 ` Lee Jones
2025-07-03 4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-03 11:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-07-10 8:15 ` Lee Jones
2025-07-08 4:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-11 2:25 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-06 2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-06 7:36 ` Lee Jones
2023-04-06 17:22 ` Mark Brown
2023-03-31 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-05 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-05 12:32 ` Lee Jones
2022-07-05 14:26 ` Aidan MacDonald
2022-02-23 16:54 broonie
2022-02-23 17:03 ` Lee Jones
2022-02-28 6:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-28 8:17 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-05 1:47 [PATCH 1/5] gpio: tps65910: use regmap accessors Michał Mirosław
2020-11-05 1:50 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-05 1:57 ` Michał Mirosław
2020-11-05 9:09 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-17 3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-17 6:56 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-17 6:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-17 7:11 ` Lee Jones
2020-02-04 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-04 7:53 ` Lee Jones
2020-02-04 10:04 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2019-04-03 0:40 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-17 5:38 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-04 3:19 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-04 9:10 ` Greg KH
2017-12-04 9:39 ` Lee Jones
2017-12-05 23:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-06 8:58 ` Lee Jones
2017-12-12 2:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-12 8:13 ` Lee Jones
2017-12-12 11:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-31 2:23 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-31 3:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-05 3:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-04 6:44 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-04 8:19 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04 8:21 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04 12:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-04-10 2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-10 6:55 ` Lee Jones
2017-04-10 7:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-29 3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-01 1:19 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2016-03-01 1:19 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2016-03-01 1:35 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2016-03-01 1:35 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2016-03-02 4:00 ` Mark Brown
2015-10-15 2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-15 3:35 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-15 8:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-15 9:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-15 9:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-15 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-15 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-16 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-16 10:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-04 0:34 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-04 0:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-04 7:26 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-11-11 2:32 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-04 5:40 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-04 7:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-11-04 8:09 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-22 16:56 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-22 19:09 ` Lee Jones
2012-09-25 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-25 6:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2012-09-25 8:43 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-09 3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-09 10:52 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-07-10 9:20 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-21 3:42 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-21 8:08 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-21 8:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-21 9:01 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-21 9:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-21 9:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-21 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-21 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-22 22:42 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-22 22:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-23 14:34 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-21 8:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-21 9:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16 6:09 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-18 8:39 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-05-14 3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-14 20:22 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-03-19 2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-19 6:19 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-03-20 12:40 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-02-21 1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-21 11:32 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-20 3:17 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 17:37 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-09-19 6:19 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-19 9:43 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-09-16 3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-16 7:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-16 8:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-18 17:15 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-06-21 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-21 10:07 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 17:58 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-02-22 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-22 9:21 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-09-16 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-19 22:27 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-08-09 1:40 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-09 8:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-08-09 9:10 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-05-19 4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-19 4:23 ` Rabin VINCENT
2010-05-19 9:57 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-05-19 14:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-08 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-08 9:33 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-04-07 5:02 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-07 8:53 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-04-07 16:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-07 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-07 8:52 ` Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365396351.542317232@f36.mail.ru \
--to=shc_work@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.