From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
David Vrabel <dvrabel@cantab.net>,
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>,
Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@lagarcavilla.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 8 [RFC]] libxc: introduce xc_domain_move_memory
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:56:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365490591.17022.14.camel@Abyss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5163A5E4.6030608@ts.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1907 bytes --]
On mar, 2013-04-09 at 06:23 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09.04.2013 04:49, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > as a mechanism of deallocating and reallocating (immediately!) _all_
> > the memory of a domain. Notice it relies on the guest being suspended
> > already, before the function is invoked.
>
> Is this solution intended to be the final one?
>
Well, the idea of sharing the patches, even at this stage, was right
about discussing that! :-P
> This might be okay for a domain with less than 1GB of memory, but I see
> problems for really huge domains. The needed time to copy the memory might
> result in long offline times.
>
I see what you mean. I thought about approaches that copy only a
specific part of the memory, perhaps according to some usage statistics.
I've not yet abandoned that idea, but I honestly think that, if we go
through the suspend-copy-resume (which is pretty much the only thing I
can do with PV guests, isn't it?), that can't be for a page or two, or
the impact of the overhead would be even higher!
> For this case something like live migration
> (optional?) would be a better solution, I think.
>
Well, I thought about that too, and I'm open to
thinking/discussing/hearing suggestions about how to implement a "live
phase" for this.
The problem is, with a more migration-alike approach, I'll end up
doubling the memory requirements of, potentially, all the domains (since
I'd need space for storing the full RAM image of each one!), which I
don't think it is an acceptable requirement either, _especially_ for big
guests, is it? :-(
Thanks for you interest, :-)
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 2:49 [PATCH 0 of 8 [RFC]] Move all the memory of a domain Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 1 of 8 [RFC]] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 2 of 8 [RFC]] xl: allow for changing NUMA node affinity on-line Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 3 of 8 [RFC]] libxc: introduce xc_domain_get_address_size Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 4 of 8 [RFC]] libxc: introduce xc_map_domain_meminfo (and xc_unmap_domain_meminfo) Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 5 of 8 [RFC]] libxc: allow for ctxt to be NULL in xc_vcpu_setcontext Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 6 of 8 [RFC]] libxc: introduce xc_domain_move_memory Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 5:23 ` Juergen Gross
2013-04-09 6:56 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-04-09 8:13 ` Juergen Gross
2013-04-09 8:51 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 9:16 ` Juergen Gross
2013-04-09 17:43 ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-04-11 14:16 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-02 14:32 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-02 15:07 ` George Dunlap
2013-05-02 15:13 ` Tim Deegan
2013-05-06 17:37 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-06 17:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 7 of 8 [RFC]] libxl: introduce libxl_domain_move_memory Dario Faggioli
2013-04-09 2:49 ` [PATCH 8 of 8 [RFC]] tools/misc: introduce xen-mfndump Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365490591.17022.14.camel@Abyss \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andres@lagarcavilla.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=dvrabel@cantab.net \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.