From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-core layer <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
bitbake-devel <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches
Subject: Re: Checksum failure encountered with download
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:41:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366033296.8670.44.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130412203746.GW2477@jama>
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 22:37 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:44:41PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > Sorry for not noticing this sooner.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > My proposal is to add md5sum of downloaded file to ChecksumError and
> > > rename it to <file>.<md5sum> in "if isinstance(e, ChecksumError):"
> >
> > Would it be possible to make this behaviour configurable for those who
> > might be concerned about disk space? Or perhaps while renaming and
> > saving it, also move it into the $TMPDIR directory and/or tie this
> > feature in with rm_work?
> >
> > I'm just thinking that over time one's DL_DIR could potentially become
> > rather cluttered with lots of failed downloads. Only some people would
> > be interested in seeing the failures and the rest would have to remove
> > them manually. I'm also thinking of the scenario where the DL_DIR is
> > shared/sync'ed among a group of people/computers; that could add up to
> > quite a bit of data to share.
>
> I can make it configurable, but I think that bad-checksums should be
> only in few exceptional cases, while package upgrades are common.
>
> That said 90% of my downloads directory are old versions I keep just to
> be able to recreate old builds with upstream sources already gone and
> now I've one renamed bad-checksum tarball from evas-1.7.6.1...
Agreed, I'd hope this isn't something which happens that often.
Cheers,
Richard
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-core layer <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
bitbake-devel <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches
Subject: Re: [bitbake-devel] Checksum failure encountered with download
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:41:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366033296.8670.44.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130412203746.GW2477@jama>
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 22:37 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:44:41PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > Sorry for not noticing this sooner.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > My proposal is to add md5sum of downloaded file to ChecksumError and
> > > rename it to <file>.<md5sum> in "if isinstance(e, ChecksumError):"
> >
> > Would it be possible to make this behaviour configurable for those who
> > might be concerned about disk space? Or perhaps while renaming and
> > saving it, also move it into the $TMPDIR directory and/or tie this
> > feature in with rm_work?
> >
> > I'm just thinking that over time one's DL_DIR could potentially become
> > rather cluttered with lots of failed downloads. Only some people would
> > be interested in seeing the failures and the rest would have to remove
> > them manually. I'm also thinking of the scenario where the DL_DIR is
> > shared/sync'ed among a group of people/computers; that could add up to
> > quite a bit of data to share.
>
> I can make it configurable, but I think that bad-checksums should be
> only in few exceptional cases, while package upgrades are common.
>
> That said 90% of my downloads directory are old versions I keep just to
> be able to recreate old builds with upstream sources already gone and
> now I've one renamed bad-checksum tarball from evas-1.7.6.1...
Agreed, I'd hope this isn't something which happens that often.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 13:30 Checksum failure encountered with download Martin Jansa
2013-04-11 21:40 ` Richard Purdie
2013-04-11 21:40 ` [bitbake-devel] " Richard Purdie
2013-04-12 14:08 ` [PATCH] fetch2: rename file with bad checksum instead of removing it completely Martin Jansa
2013-04-12 19:44 ` Checksum failure encountered with download Trevor Woerner
2013-04-12 19:44 ` [bitbake-devel] " Trevor Woerner
2013-04-12 20:37 ` Martin Jansa
2013-04-12 20:37 ` [bitbake-devel] " Martin Jansa
2013-04-15 13:41 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-04-15 13:41 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366033296.8670.44.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.