From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: arm@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH/RESEND] ARM: arch_timer: Silence debug preempt warnings
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366241178-16626-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Hot-plugging with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y on a device with arm
architected timers causes a slew of "using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible" warnings:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/111
caller is arch_timer_cpu_notify+0x14/0xc8
This happens because sometimes the cpu notifier,
arch_timer_cpu_notify(), is called in preemptible context and
other times in non-preemptible context but we use this_cpu_ptr()
to retrieve the clockevent in all cases. We're only going to
actually use the pointer in non-preemptible context though, so
push the this_cpu_ptr() access down into the cases to force the
checks to occur only in non-preemptible contexts.
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
Resending to arm-soc maintainers instead of timekeeping maintainers. Who
maintains this driver?
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index d7ad425..a65a710 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -248,14 +248,16 @@ static void __cpuinit arch_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk)
static int __cpuinit arch_timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
- struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt);
-
+ /*
+ * Grab cpu pointer in each case to avoid spurious
+ * preemptible warnings
+ */
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_STARTING:
- arch_timer_setup(evt);
+ arch_timer_setup(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
break;
case CPU_DYING:
- arch_timer_stop(evt);
+ arch_timer_stop(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
break;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RESEND] ARM: arch_timer: Silence debug preempt warnings
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366241178-16626-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Hot-plugging with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y on a device with arm
architected timers causes a slew of "using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible" warnings:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/111
caller is arch_timer_cpu_notify+0x14/0xc8
This happens because sometimes the cpu notifier,
arch_timer_cpu_notify(), is called in preemptible context and
other times in non-preemptible context but we use this_cpu_ptr()
to retrieve the clockevent in all cases. We're only going to
actually use the pointer in non-preemptible context though, so
push the this_cpu_ptr() access down into the cases to force the
checks to occur only in non-preemptible contexts.
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
Resending to arm-soc maintainers instead of timekeeping maintainers. Who
maintains this driver?
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index d7ad425..a65a710 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -248,14 +248,16 @@ static void __cpuinit arch_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk)
static int __cpuinit arch_timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
- struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt);
-
+ /*
+ * Grab cpu pointer in each case to avoid spurious
+ * preemptible warnings
+ */
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_STARTING:
- arch_timer_setup(evt);
+ arch_timer_setup(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
break;
case CPU_DYING:
- arch_timer_stop(evt);
+ arch_timer_stop(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
break;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 23:26 Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-04-17 23:26 ` [PATCH/RESEND] ARM: arch_timer: Silence debug preempt warnings Stephen Boyd
2013-04-25 18:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-25 18:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-27 0:18 ` Olof Johansson
2013-04-27 0:18 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366241178-16626-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.