From: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
Cc: Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Greg Thelen <gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 21/31] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 00:23:09 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368044599-3383-22-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368044599-3383-1-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will implement the in-shrinker logic to filter objects
based on its memcg association.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/shrinker.h | 4 ++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
mm/vmscan.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d6183f0..4c24249 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
bool mem_cgroup_bad_page_check(struct page *page);
void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page);
#endif
+
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone);
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
struct mem_cgroup;
@@ -377,6 +380,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage,
struct page *newpage)
{
}
+
+static inline unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
#if !defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
@@ -429,6 +438,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
}
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
/*
* In general, we'll do everything in our power to not incur in any overhead
* for non-memcg users for the kmem functions. Not even a function call, if we
@@ -562,6 +573,12 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
}
#else
+
+static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
for (; NULL; )
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 00a3e57..3b08869 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct shrink_control {
/* shrink from these nodes */
nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
+
+ /* reclaim from this memcg only (if not NULL) */
+ struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
};
/*
@@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
+ bool memcg_shrinker; /* memcg-aware shrinker */
/* These are for internal use */
struct list_head list;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a8a69b4..ef420e1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_set_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
-static bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
return test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
@@ -971,6 +971,20 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int zid,
return ret;
}
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ val = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+ if (do_swap_account)
+ val += mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ LRU_ALL_ANON);
+ return val;
+}
+
static unsigned long
mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid, unsigned int lru_mask)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 024e9c9..295f128 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -139,11 +139,42 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
}
+
+/*
+ * kmem reclaim should usually not be triggered when we are doing targetted
+ * reclaim. It is only valid when global reclaim is triggered, or when the
+ * underlying memcg has kmem objects.
+ */
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->target_mem_cgroup ||
+ memcg_kmem_is_active(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ return memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(sc->target_mem_cgroup, zone);
+}
+
#else
static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return true;
}
+
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+}
#endif
static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
@@ -222,6 +253,14 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
: SHRINK_BATCH;
+ /*
+ * If we don't have a target mem cgroup, we scan them all.
+ * Otherwise we will limit our scan to shrinkers marked as
+ * memcg aware
+ */
+ if (shrinkctl->target_mem_cgroup && !shrinker->memcg_shrinker)
+ continue;
+
max_pass = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
WARN_ON(max_pass < 0);
if (max_pass <= 0)
@@ -2189,9 +2228,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
- * over limit cgroups
+ * over limit cgroups, unless we know they have kmem objects
*/
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+ if (has_kmem_reclaim(sc)) {
unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
@@ -2200,7 +2239,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
continue;
- lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ lru_pages += zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(sc, zone);
node_set(zone_to_nid(zone),
shrink->nodes_to_scan);
}
@@ -2469,6 +2508,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
};
struct shrink_control shrink = {
.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
+ .target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
};
/*
--
1.8.1.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
hughd@google.com, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 21/31] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 00:23:09 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368044599-3383-22-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368044599-3383-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org>
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will implement the in-shrinker logic to filter objects
based on its memcg association.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/shrinker.h | 4 ++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
mm/vmscan.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d6183f0..4c24249 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head);
bool mem_cgroup_bad_page_check(struct page *page);
void mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page);
#endif
+
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone);
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
struct mem_cgroup;
@@ -377,6 +380,12 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_replace_page_cache(struct page *oldpage,
struct page *newpage)
{
}
+
+static inline unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
#if !defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)
@@ -429,6 +438,8 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
}
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+
/*
* In general, we'll do everything in our power to not incur in any overhead
* for non-memcg users for the kmem functions. Not even a function call, if we
@@ -562,6 +573,12 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
}
#else
+
+static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \
for (; NULL; )
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 00a3e57..3b08869 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct shrink_control {
/* shrink from these nodes */
nodemask_t nodes_to_scan;
+
+ /* reclaim from this memcg only (if not NULL) */
+ struct mem_cgroup *target_mem_cgroup;
};
/*
@@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
+ bool memcg_shrinker; /* memcg-aware shrinker */
/* These are for internal use */
struct list_head list;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a8a69b4..ef420e1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_set_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
set_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
-static bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
return test_bit(KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE, &memcg->kmem_account_flags);
}
@@ -971,6 +971,20 @@ mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int zid,
return ret;
}
+unsigned long
+memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ val = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid, LRU_ALL_FILE);
+ if (do_swap_account)
+ val += mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ LRU_ALL_ANON);
+ return val;
+}
+
static unsigned long
mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid, unsigned int lru_mask)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 024e9c9..295f128 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -139,11 +139,42 @@ static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
}
+
+/*
+ * kmem reclaim should usually not be triggered when we are doing targetted
+ * reclaim. It is only valid when global reclaim is triggered, or when the
+ * underlying memcg has kmem objects.
+ */
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->target_mem_cgroup ||
+ memcg_kmem_is_active(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ return memcg_zone_reclaimable_pages(sc->target_mem_cgroup, zone);
+}
+
#else
static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
{
return true;
}
+
+static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long
+zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
+{
+ return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+}
#endif
static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
@@ -222,6 +253,14 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
: SHRINK_BATCH;
+ /*
+ * If we don't have a target mem cgroup, we scan them all.
+ * Otherwise we will limit our scan to shrinkers marked as
+ * memcg aware
+ */
+ if (shrinkctl->target_mem_cgroup && !shrinker->memcg_shrinker)
+ continue;
+
max_pass = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
WARN_ON(max_pass < 0);
if (max_pass <= 0)
@@ -2189,9 +2228,9 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
/*
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
- * over limit cgroups
+ * over limit cgroups, unless we know they have kmem objects
*/
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
+ if (has_kmem_reclaim(sc)) {
unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
@@ -2200,7 +2239,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
continue;
- lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
+ lru_pages += zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(sc, zone);
node_set(zone_to_nid(zone),
shrink->nodes_to_scan);
}
@@ -2469,6 +2508,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
};
struct shrink_control shrink = {
.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask,
+ .target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
};
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-08 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-08 20:22 [PATCH v5 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 02/31] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1368044599-3383-1-git-send-email-glommer-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 01/31] super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 03/31] dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 04/31] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 05/31] dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 06/31] mm: new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 07/31] shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 08/31] list: add a new LRU list type Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 09/31] inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 10/31] dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 11/31] list_lru: per-node " Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 12/31] shrinker: add node awareness Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 13/31] fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 14/31] xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 15/31] xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 16/31] fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 18/31] shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 19/31] hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 20/31] shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 21/31] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 22/31] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 23/31] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 24/31] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 25/31] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 26/31] memcg: scan cache objects hierarchically Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 27/31] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 29/31] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 30/31] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 31/31] memcg: debugging facility to access dangling memcgs Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 17/31] drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-08 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 28/31] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Glauber Costa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-09 6:06 [PATCH v5 00/31] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-09 6:06 ` [PATCH v5 21/31] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-05-09 6:06 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-09 6:06 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1368044599-3383-22-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org \
--to=glommer-gefaqzzx7r8dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.