* regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not be built as module?
@ 2013-06-28 13:36 Axel Lin
2013-06-28 13:50 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2013-06-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Yi Zhang, Chao Xie, Liam Girdwood, linux-kernel
Hi,
I ask this because MFD_88PM800 can be built as module.
So any reason REGULATOR_88PM800 must be bool?
Regards,
Axel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not be built as module?
2013-06-28 13:36 regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not be built as module? Axel Lin
@ 2013-06-28 13:50 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-06-28 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: Yi Zhang, Chao Xie, Liam Girdwood, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 198 bytes --]
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:36:25PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> I ask this because MFD_88PM800 can be built as module.
> So any reason REGULATOR_88PM800 must be bool?
No, it should be module capable.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-28 13:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-28 13:36 regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not be built as module? Axel Lin
2013-06-28 13:50 ` Mark Brown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.