All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: Fix deadlock scenario with smp_send_stop()
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:36:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374698170-26605-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130724202148.GA24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

If one process calls sys_reboot and that process then stops other
CPUs while those CPUs are within a spin_lock() region we can
potentially encounter a deadlock scenario like below.

CPU 0                   CPU 1
-----                   -----
                        spin_lock(my_lock)
smp_send_stop()
 <send IPI>             handle_IPI()
                         disable_preemption/irqs
                          while(1);
 <PREEMPT>
spin_lock(my_lock) <--- Waits forever

We shouldn't attempt to run any other tasks after we send a stop
IPI to a CPU so disable preemption so that this task runs to
completion. We use local_irq_disable() here for cross-arch
consistency with x86.

Reported-by: Sundarajan Srinivasan <sundaraj@codeaurora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---

Changes since v1:
 - Use local_irq_disable() instead of preempt_disable()

 arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
index d3ca4f6..08b47eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ void machine_shutdown(void)
  */
 void machine_halt(void)
 {
+	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
 	local_irq_disable();
@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ void machine_halt(void)
  */
 void machine_power_off(void)
 {
+	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
 	if (pm_power_off)
@@ -230,6 +232,7 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
  */
 void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 {
+	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
 	arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: Fix deadlock scenario with smp_send_stop()
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:36:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374698170-26605-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130724202148.GA24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

If one process calls sys_reboot and that process then stops other
CPUs while those CPUs are within a spin_lock() region we can
potentially encounter a deadlock scenario like below.

CPU 0                   CPU 1
-----                   -----
                        spin_lock(my_lock)
smp_send_stop()
 <send IPI>             handle_IPI()
                         disable_preemption/irqs
                          while(1);
 <PREEMPT>
spin_lock(my_lock) <--- Waits forever

We shouldn't attempt to run any other tasks after we send a stop
IPI to a CPU so disable preemption so that this task runs to
completion. We use local_irq_disable() here for cross-arch
consistency with x86.

Reported-by: Sundarajan Srinivasan <sundaraj@codeaurora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---

Changes since v1:
 - Use local_irq_disable() instead of preempt_disable()

 arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
index d3ca4f6..08b47eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ void machine_shutdown(void)
  */
 void machine_halt(void)
 {
+	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
 	local_irq_disable();
@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ void machine_halt(void)
  */
 void machine_power_off(void)
 {
+	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
 	if (pm_power_off)
@@ -230,6 +232,7 @@ void machine_power_off(void)
  */
 void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 {
+	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
 	arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-24 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09 15:36 [PATCH] ARM: Fix deadlock scenario with smp_send_stop() Stephen Boyd
2013-07-09 15:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-24 18:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-24 18:56   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-24 20:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-24 20:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-24 20:29     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-24 20:29       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-24 20:36     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-07-24 20:36       ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Boyd
2013-07-30 22:12       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-30 22:12         ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1374698170-26605-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.