Unbound module Mmap

Unbound module Mmap

[yvxiang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 715 bytes --]

Hi,
    When I apply some changes to Xen-4.1.2(mainly change the files in
tools/libxl) , then comile it , I meet the problem as follow :
         MLI       op.mli
         MLI      op.cmi
         MLI       partial.mli
         MLI      partial.cmi
         MLI       packet.mli
         MLI      packet.cmi
         MLC      op.cmo
         MLC      partial.cmo
         MLC      packet.cmo
         MLC      xs_ring.cmo
         MLI       xb.mli
         File "xb.ml", line 27, characters 7-26:
         Error: Unbound module Mmap
         make[6]: *** [xb.mli] Error 2
         rm packet.mli partial.mli op.mli

    I'm sorry I'm a new comer , so please could you tell me how to solve
this problem?
    Thanks:)

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 984 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[Wei Liu]

On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:53:11PM +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> Hi,
>     When I apply some changes to Xen-4.1.2(mainly change the files in
> tools/libxl) , then comile it , I meet the problem as follow :
>          MLI       op.mli
>          MLI      op.cmi
>          MLI       partial.mli
>          MLI      partial.cmi
>          MLI       packet.mli
>          MLI      packet.cmi
>          MLC      op.cmo
>          MLC      partial.cmo
>          MLC      packet.cmo
>          MLC      xs_ring.cmo
>          MLI       xb.mli
>          File "xb.ml", line 27, characters 7-26:
>          Error: Unbound module Mmap
>          make[6]: *** [xb.mli] Error 2
>          rm packet.mli partial.mli op.mli
> 
>     I'm sorry I'm a new comer , so please could you tell me how to solve
> this problem?

It's unclear to me why your modification to libxl would affect the Ocaml
part. You'd better be more specific on what you did and what you tried
to achieve.


Wei.

>     Thanks:)

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[yvxiang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1396 bytes --]

I just want to apply some patches of xen-4.3 to xen-4.1.2 , and the all the
changed codes are in tools/libxl , nothing to ocaml part .  May be the
problem of Makefile?


2013/8/5 Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:53:11PM +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >     When I apply some changes to Xen-4.1.2(mainly change the files in
> > tools/libxl) , then comile it , I meet the problem as follow :
> >          MLI       op.mli
> >          MLI      op.cmi
> >          MLI       partial.mli
> >          MLI      partial.cmi
> >          MLI       packet.mli
> >          MLI      packet.cmi
> >          MLC      op.cmo
> >          MLC      partial.cmo
> >          MLC      packet.cmo
> >          MLC      xs_ring.cmo
> >          MLI       xb.mli
> >          File "xb.ml", line 27, characters 7-26:
> >          Error: Unbound module Mmap
> >          make[6]: *** [xb.mli] Error 2
> >          rm packet.mli partial.mli op.mli
> >
> >     I'm sorry I'm a new comer , so please could you tell me how to solve
> > this problem?
>
> It's unclear to me why your modification to libxl would affect the Ocaml
> part. You'd better be more specific on what you did and what you tried
> to achieve.
>
>
> Wei.
>
> >     Thanks:)
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2182 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[Wei Liu]

Please don't top-post.

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:14:27AM +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> I just want to apply some patches of xen-4.3 to xen-4.1.2 , and the all the
> changed codes are in tools/libxl , nothing to ocaml part .  May be the
> problem of Makefile?
> 

Could be. But we can never know until you make it clear what you've
done.


Wei.

> 
> 2013/8/5 Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> 
> > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 02:53:11PM +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >     When I apply some changes to Xen-4.1.2(mainly change the files in
> > > tools/libxl) , then comile it , I meet the problem as follow :
> > >          MLI       op.mli
> > >          MLI      op.cmi
> > >          MLI       partial.mli
> > >          MLI      partial.cmi
> > >          MLI       packet.mli
> > >          MLI      packet.cmi
> > >          MLC      op.cmo
> > >          MLC      partial.cmo
> > >          MLC      packet.cmo
> > >          MLC      xs_ring.cmo
> > >          MLI       xb.mli
> > >          File "xb.ml", line 27, characters 7-26:
> > >          Error: Unbound module Mmap
> > >          make[6]: *** [xb.mli] Error 2
> > >          rm packet.mli partial.mli op.mli
> > >
> > >     I'm sorry I'm a new comer , so please could you tell me how to solve
> > > this problem?
> >
> > It's unclear to me why your modification to libxl would affect the Ocaml
> > part. You'd better be more specific on what you did and what you tried
> > to achieve.
> >
> >
> > Wei.
> >
> > >     Thanks:)
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> >
> >

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[Ian Campbell]

On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 14:53 +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> Hi,
>     When I apply some changes to Xen-4.1.2(mainly change the files in
> tools/libxl) , then comile it , I meet the problem as follow :

Does it work if you build pristine 4.1.2 without your changes?

You could try "git clean -fdx tools/ocaml" to wipe out any vestiges of
an old build otherwise as Wei says you will need to shows us your
patches.

Ian.

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[Dario Faggioli]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1126 bytes --]

On lun, 2013-08-05 at 10:14 +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> I just want to apply some patches of xen-4.3 to xen-4.1.2 , and the
> all the changed codes are in tools/libxl , nothing to ocaml part .
>  May be the problem of Makefile?
> 
Is this still about applying my RFC patches about memory migration? I
seriously doubt it (OCaml, what is OCaml? :-O) but, as I said, I really
don't know what would happen if applying them to any old (or even new,
actually) version of Xen, neither I plan to do much investigation on it.

If it's not about them, sorry for interrupting.

If it is, and you are interested in the feature --as I already said a
couple of time-- make your interest, your availability, your knowledges,
etc., more explicit, and I'll be happy to bring you on-board for the
development of it (which, again, is still ongoing).

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[yvxiang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1376 bytes --]

Yes, I've move your patches about memory migration to Xen-4.1.2, and then
the problem comes. I dont' know why. Does ocaml has any relationship with
the codes in libxl/tools?


2013/8/6 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>

> On lun, 2013-08-05 at 10:14 +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> > I just want to apply some patches of xen-4.3 to xen-4.1.2 , and the
> > all the changed codes are in tools/libxl , nothing to ocaml part .
> >  May be the problem of Makefile?
> >
> Is this still about applying my RFC patches about memory migration? I
> seriously doubt it (OCaml, what is OCaml? :-O) but, as I said, I really
> don't know what would happen if applying them to any old (or even new,
> actually) version of Xen, neither I plan to do much investigation on it.
>
> If it's not about them, sorry for interrupting.
>
> If it is, and you are interested in the feature --as I already said a
> couple of time-- make your interest, your availability, your knowledges,
> etc., more explicit, and I'll be happy to bring you on-board for the
> development of it (which, again, is still ongoing).
>
> Regards,
> Dario
>
> --
> <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
>
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1952 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[Wei Liu]

Please don't top-post.

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:43:20AM +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> Yes, I've move your patches about memory migration to Xen-4.1.2, and then
> the problem comes. I dont' know why. Does ocaml has any relationship with
> the codes in libxl/tools?
> 

Could you check if there is any other error preceding the ocaml ones.


Wei.

> 
> 2013/8/6 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> 
> > On lun, 2013-08-05 at 10:14 +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> > > I just want to apply some patches of xen-4.3 to xen-4.1.2 , and the
> > > all the changed codes are in tools/libxl , nothing to ocaml part .
> > >  May be the problem of Makefile?
> > >
> > Is this still about applying my RFC patches about memory migration? I
> > seriously doubt it (OCaml, what is OCaml? :-O) but, as I said, I really
> > don't know what would happen if applying them to any old (or even new,
> > actually) version of Xen, neither I plan to do much investigation on it.
> >
> > If it's not about them, sorry for interrupting.
> >
> > If it is, and you are interested in the feature --as I already said a
> > couple of time-- make your interest, your availability, your knowledges,
> > etc., more explicit, and I'll be happy to bring you on-board for the
> > development of it (which, again, is still ongoing).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dario
> >
> > --
> > <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
> >
> >

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[yvxiang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2081 bytes --]

Before the ocaml ones, I met the problem as following :
     libxenlight.so: undefined reference to 'yajl_gen_array_close
     libxenlight.so: undefined reference to 'yajl_gen_integer'
     libxenlight.so: undefined reference to 'yajl_alloc'
     .......
And I add the -lyajl option in the Makefile then the problem solved, and
the ocaml ones come.




2013/8/6 Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

> Please don't top-post.
>
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:43:20AM +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> > Yes, I've move your patches about memory migration to Xen-4.1.2, and then
> > the problem comes. I dont' know why. Does ocaml has any relationship with
> > the codes in libxl/tools?
> >
>
> Could you check if there is any other error preceding the ocaml ones.
>
>
> Wei.
>
> >
> > 2013/8/6 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> >
> > > On lun, 2013-08-05 at 10:14 +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> > > > I just want to apply some patches of xen-4.3 to xen-4.1.2 , and the
> > > > all the changed codes are in tools/libxl , nothing to ocaml part .
> > > >  May be the problem of Makefile?
> > > >
> > > Is this still about applying my RFC patches about memory migration? I
> > > seriously doubt it (OCaml, what is OCaml? :-O) but, as I said, I really
> > > don't know what would happen if applying them to any old (or even new,
> > > actually) version of Xen, neither I plan to do much investigation on
> it.
> > >
> > > If it's not about them, sorry for interrupting.
> > >
> > > If it is, and you are interested in the feature --as I already said a
> > > couple of time-- make your interest, your availability, your
> knowledges,
> > > etc., more explicit, and I'll be happy to bring you on-board for the
> > > development of it (which, again, is still ongoing).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dario
> > >
> > > --
> > > <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> > > Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
> > >
> > >
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3089 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: Unbound module Mmap

[Dario Faggioli]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1072 bytes --]

On mar, 2013-08-06 at 09:43 +0800, yvxiang wrote:
> Yes, I've move your patches about memory migration to Xen-4.1.2, and
> then the problem comes. 
>
Ok, could you stop doing that or, if you want to continue doing that,
stop asking?

I'm sorry, I don't want to sound rude, but what you are trying to do is
_supposed_ to be broken and unsupported, so there is very few point in
asking for support about it.

I've told you countless times that, if you want to be involved in
properly developing that feature, we can arrange something out.

I'm telling this one more and last time here. If you want to
participate, tell me. If you want to keep trying apply an incomplete and
non-fully working RFC to some old version of Xen, go ahead, but, please,
avoid bothering the list.

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel