* Using bitbake to make compiler headers?
@ 2013-09-23 16:39 Joshua Kurland
2013-09-23 16:42 ` mzelina
2013-09-23 17:31 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Kurland @ 2013-09-23 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 338 bytes --]
Is it possible to compile using bitbake but keep all of the rootfs compiler
headers in /usr/include? I need to cross-compile a large project onto a
wandboard, but to do that I need these headers. Essentially I want to make
a "build rootfs" instead of the compiled output. Is something like this
possible?
Thanks,
Josh Kurland
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 398 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Using bitbake to make compiler headers?
2013-09-23 16:39 Using bitbake to make compiler headers? Joshua Kurland
@ 2013-09-23 16:42 ` mzelina
2013-09-23 17:31 ` Otavio Salvador
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mzelina @ 2013-09-23 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Kurland; +Cc: meta-freescale
I use:
bitbake meta-toolchain-qt
To build a toolchain. Look in tmp/deploy/images for a .sh file that you can run to install the software. You will need to source the environment setup file then will be off and running.
Mike
"Joshua Kurland" <joshua.kurland@adtecdigital.net> said:
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
> Is it possible to compile using bitbake but keep all of the rootfs compiler
> headers in /usr/include? I need to cross-compile a large project onto a
> wandboard, but to do that I need these headers. Essentially I want to make
> a "build rootfs" instead of the compiled output. Is something like this
> possible?
>
> Thanks,
> Josh Kurland
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Using bitbake to make compiler headers?
2013-09-23 16:39 Using bitbake to make compiler headers? Joshua Kurland
2013-09-23 16:42 ` mzelina
@ 2013-09-23 17:31 ` Otavio Salvador
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2013-09-23 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Kurland; +Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Joshua Kurland
<joshua.kurland@adtecdigital.net> wrote:
> Is it possible to compile using bitbake but keep all of the rootfs compiler
> headers in /usr/include? I need to cross-compile a large project onto a
> wandboard, but to do that I need these headers. Essentially I want to make
> a "build rootfs" instead of the compiled output. Is something like this
> possible?
This is possible in multiple ways; you can:
- make an image which provides a full SDK and build in target;
- make a toolchain with all headers you need;
Please make a more descriptive goal so I can advise.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-23 17:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-23 16:39 Using bitbake to make compiler headers? Joshua Kurland
2013-09-23 16:42 ` mzelina
2013-09-23 17:31 ` Otavio Salvador
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.