All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com>
Cc: openembeded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	openembedded-core <Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: SRC_URI computing order
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:20:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383866418.6271.288.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQYJAttXLv8jQczSLU=8C9iw6z9JS6xbOrOiB7ahaowzLWx8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:45 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Richard Purdie
> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 23:16 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> >>> I have to report an undesiderate behavior:
> >>>
> >>> the formfactor files in our .bbappend are not considered :/
> >>> DEBUG: Searching for machconfig in paths:....
> >>>   /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/formfactor-0.0/
> >>>   /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/formfactor/
> >>>   /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/
> >>>   /oe/meta-handheld/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/poodle
> >>>
> >>> so we end up with the empty machconfig of
> >>> /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/
> >>>
> >>> Surely this didn't happen when we tested the recipe.
> >>
> >> With which revision of OE-Core? Was this with the dora release tag,
> >> current dora head or master?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Richard
> >>
> >>
> >
> > This was with fresh master:
> >
> > Build Configuration:
> > BB_VERSION        = "1.21.0"
> > BUILD_SYS         = "i686-linux"
> > NATIVELSBSTRING   = "Gentoo"
> > TARGET_SYS        = "arm-oe-linux-gnueabi"
> > MACHINE           = "poodle"
> > DISTRO_VERSION    = "oe-core.0"
> > TUNE_FEATURES     = "armv5 thumb dsp"
> > TARGET_FPU        = "soft"
> > meta              = "master:511b4194165ed7a5645169e09c27db280d5a5316"
> > meta-initramfs    = "master:4d62e7f575e2a87197c74ab4639561b45eec0e60"
> > meta-handheld     = "master:55a310666b543e6beca47fa3c197492d5a6cf8ff"
> >
> > Cheers
> FYI
> In the hurry for a solution for fixing formfactor and ipaq-boot-params
> my quick hack was to revert
> 
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta?id=92cbf7eeea553bfa24c7081473fa8bc4ebc1f552
> 
> That appears to fix the specific issue...

Its a hacky workaround. The real issue is that you don't set DISTRO and
this puts a :: into FILESOVERRIDES (and OVERRIDES). I've sent a patch
out which sets a default for DISTRO since its the nicer way I could find
to fix this. The behaviour in the above patch is correct.

Cheers,

Richard



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com>
Cc: openembeded-devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	openembedded-core <Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] SRC_URI computing order
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:20:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383866418.6271.288.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQYJAttXLv8jQczSLU=8C9iw6z9JS6xbOrOiB7ahaowzLWx8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:45 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Richard Purdie
> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 23:16 +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> >>> I have to report an undesiderate behavior:
> >>>
> >>> the formfactor files in our .bbappend are not considered :/
> >>> DEBUG: Searching for machconfig in paths:....
> >>>   /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/formfactor-0.0/
> >>>   /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/formfactor/
> >>>   /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/
> >>>   /oe/meta-handheld/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/poodle
> >>>
> >>> so we end up with the empty machconfig of
> >>> /oe/oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor/files/
> >>>
> >>> Surely this didn't happen when we tested the recipe.
> >>
> >> With which revision of OE-Core? Was this with the dora release tag,
> >> current dora head or master?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Richard
> >>
> >>
> >
> > This was with fresh master:
> >
> > Build Configuration:
> > BB_VERSION        = "1.21.0"
> > BUILD_SYS         = "i686-linux"
> > NATIVELSBSTRING   = "Gentoo"
> > TARGET_SYS        = "arm-oe-linux-gnueabi"
> > MACHINE           = "poodle"
> > DISTRO_VERSION    = "oe-core.0"
> > TUNE_FEATURES     = "armv5 thumb dsp"
> > TARGET_FPU        = "soft"
> > meta              = "master:511b4194165ed7a5645169e09c27db280d5a5316"
> > meta-initramfs    = "master:4d62e7f575e2a87197c74ab4639561b45eec0e60"
> > meta-handheld     = "master:55a310666b543e6beca47fa3c197492d5a6cf8ff"
> >
> > Cheers
> FYI
> In the hurry for a solution for fixing formfactor and ipaq-boot-params
> my quick hack was to revert
> 
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta?id=92cbf7eeea553bfa24c7081473fa8bc4ebc1f552
> 
> That appears to fix the specific issue...

Its a hacky workaround. The real issue is that you don't set DISTRO and
this puts a :: into FILESOVERRIDES (and OVERRIDES). I've sent a patch
out which sets a default for DISTRO since its the nicer way I could find
to fix this. The behaviour in the above patch is correct.

Cheers,

Richard



  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-07 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-09 22:42 [PATCH] utils.bbclass: Fix override ordering for FILESPATH Richard Purdie
2013-10-28 14:10 ` SRC_URI computing order Eric Bénard
2013-10-29  3:45   ` Khem Raj
2013-10-29  7:28     ` Eric Bénard
2013-10-30 15:15       ` Richard Purdie
2013-11-02  8:47         ` Eric Bénard
2013-11-03 22:16           ` Andrea Adami
2013-11-03 23:10             ` Richard Purdie
2013-11-04 22:13               ` Andrea Adami
2013-11-04 22:13                 ` [OE-core] " Andrea Adami
2013-11-06  8:45                 ` Andrea Adami
2013-11-06  8:45                   ` [OE-core] " Andrea Adami
2013-11-07 23:20                   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-11-07 23:20                     ` Richard Purdie
2013-11-08 11:55                     ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-08 11:55                       ` [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador
2013-11-04  8:33             ` Eric Bénard
2013-11-01 15:36   ` Eric Bénard
2013-11-01 18:16     ` Richard Purdie
2013-11-02  8:45       ` Eric Bénard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1383866418.6271.288.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=andrea.adami@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.