All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:32:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1385569979.32005.2.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385569457-8650-2-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 16:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> 
> Eliminate the gap between DT becoming available and this being used to say
> we have full constraints by checking directly for DT every time we check
> for full constraints. This improves interoperaton with optional regulator
> support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 02fdf925bb56..d85f31385b24 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  
>  static bool have_full_constraints(void)
>  {
> -	return has_full_constraints;
> +	return has_full_constraints || of_have_populated_dt();
>  }
>  
>  /**

Doesn't this now make this code in regulator_init_complete()
redundant..?

	if (of_have_populated_dt())
		has_full_constraints = true;

Or is keeping this to avoid one less variable check a worthwhile
optimisation?

-- 
Tixy


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-27 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-27 16:24 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:32   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2013-11-27 16:53     ` Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:55   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-11-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1385569979.32005.2.camel@linaro1.home \
    --to=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@linaro.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.