From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: extract hsw_power_well_post_{enable, disable}
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:50:09 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386795010-1635-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386795010-1635-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
I want to add more code to the post_enable function.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index c01d08d..ce2a188 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5682,12 +5682,53 @@ bool intel_display_power_enabled(struct drm_device *dev,
return is_enabled;
}
+static void hsw_power_well_post_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
+ unsigned long irqflags;
+
+ if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_B),
+ dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B]);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_B),
+ ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B] |
+ GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_C),
+ dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C]);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C),
+ ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C] |
+ GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
+ POSTING_READ(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
+ }
+}
+
+static void hsw_power_well_post_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
+ enum pipe p;
+ unsigned long irqflags;
+
+ /*
+ * After this, the registers on the pipes that are part of the power
+ * well will become zero, so we have to adjust our counters according to
+ * that.
+ *
+ * FIXME: Should we do this in general in drm_vblank_post_modeset?
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+ for_each_pipe(p)
+ if (p != PIPE_A)
+ dev->vblank[p].last = 0;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+}
+
static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev,
struct i915_power_well *power_well, bool enable)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
bool is_enabled, enable_requested;
- unsigned long irqflags;
uint32_t tmp;
WARN_ON(dev_priv->pc8.enabled);
@@ -5708,42 +5749,14 @@ static void hsw_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev,
DRM_ERROR("Timeout enabling power well\n");
}
- if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_B),
- dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B]);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_B),
- ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_B] |
- GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IMR(PIPE_C),
- dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C]);
- I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C),
- ~dev_priv->de_irq_mask[PIPE_C] |
- GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK);
- POSTING_READ(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IER(PIPE_C));
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
- }
+ hsw_power_well_post_enable(dev_priv);
} else {
if (enable_requested) {
- enum pipe p;
-
I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, 0);
POSTING_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER);
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Requesting to disable the power well\n");
- /*
- * After this, the registers on the pipes that are part
- * of the power well will become zero, so we have to
- * adjust our counters according to that.
- *
- * FIXME: Should we do this in general in
- * drm_vblank_post_modeset?
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
- for_each_pipe(p)
- if (p != PIPE_A)
- dev->vblank[p].last = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+ hsw_power_well_post_disable(dev_priv);
}
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 20:50 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: remove i915_disable_vga_mem declaration Paulo Zanoni
2013-12-11 20:50 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2013-12-12 11:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: extract hsw_power_well_post_{enable, disable} Damien Lespiau
2013-12-11 20:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: touch VGA MSR after we enable the power well Paulo Zanoni
2013-12-12 11:36 ` Damien Lespiau
2013-12-12 12:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-12 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: remove i915_disable_vga_mem declaration Damien Lespiau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386795010-1635-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
--to=przanoni@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.