* regulator: question about commit d886a041646 pfuze100-regulator: Fix MODULE_ALIAS()
@ 2013-12-31 17:00 Axel Lin
2013-12-31 17:19 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2013-12-31 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam; +Cc: Mark Brown, Liam Girdwood, linux-kernel
Hi,
I just found this commit after pull regulator updates.
So why to use 'platform' prefix in MODULE_ALIAS for i2c driver?
Does it really work?
Regards,
Axel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: regulator: question about commit d886a041646 pfuze100-regulator: Fix MODULE_ALIAS()
2013-12-31 17:00 regulator: question about commit d886a041646 pfuze100-regulator: Fix MODULE_ALIAS() Axel Lin
@ 2013-12-31 17:19 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-12-31 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Axel Lin; +Cc: Fabio Estevam, Liam Girdwood, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 01:00:44AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> I just found this commit after pull regulator updates.
> So why to use 'platform' prefix in MODULE_ALIAS for i2c driver?
> Does it really work?
No, it shouldn't work - I'll drop that commit for now. Sorry, such a
mistake didn't occur to me when reviewing. The reason most regulators
are platform devices is that they are part of MFDs.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-31 17:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-31 17:00 regulator: question about commit d886a041646 pfuze100-regulator: Fix MODULE_ALIAS() Axel Lin
2013-12-31 17:19 ` Mark Brown
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.