[PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/bdw: The TLB invalidation mechanism has been removed from INSTPM

[Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@linux.intel.com>]

From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>

While wandering in the spec, I noticed that BDW removes those 2 bits
from INSTPM. I couldn't find any direct way to invalidate the TLB (ie
without the ring working already). Maybe someone will be more lucky.

At least, we now know we may be a problem.

Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
[BDW 3.14 backport]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 2ac8f94..c1ee5ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -977,8 +977,14 @@ void intel_ring_setup_status_page(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
 	I915_WRITE(mmio, (u32)ring->status_page.gfx_addr);
 	POSTING_READ(mmio);
 
-	/* Flush the TLB for this page */
-	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) {
+	/*
+	 * Flush the TLB for this page
+	 *
+	 * FIXME: These two bits have disappeared on gen8, so a question
+	 * arises: do we still need this and if so how should we go about
+	 * invalidating the TLB?
+	 */
+	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8) {
 		u32 reg = RING_INSTPM(ring->mmio_base);
 		I915_WRITE(reg,
 			   _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_TLB_INVALIDATE |
-- 
1.9.1