All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: subashab@codeaurora.org
To: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
Cc: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>, "Daniele Palmas" <dnlplm@gmail.com>,
	"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Sean Tranchetti" <stranche@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: RMNET QMAP data aggregation with size greater than 16384
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:42:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13972ac97ffe7a10fd85fe03dc84dc02@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAP7ucJRbg58Yqcx-qFFUuu=_=3Ss1HE1ZW4XGrm0KsSXnwdmA@mail.gmail.com>

> I tried with a SIMCOM 7600E, with data aggregation enabled with QMAPv1:
> 
> $ sudo qmicli -d /dev/cdc-wdm0 -p --wda-get-data-format
> [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Successfully got data format
>                    QoS flow header: no
>                Link layer protocol: 'raw-ip'
>   Uplink data aggregation protocol: 'qmap'
> Downlink data aggregation protocol: 'qmap'
>                      NDP signature: '0'
> Downlink data aggregation max datagrams: '10'
> Downlink data aggregation max size: '4096'
> 
> As you suggested, the MTU of the new muxed interface is set to 1500
> and the MTU of the master interface to only 4 more bytes (1504):
> 
> # ip link
> 8: wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1504 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>     link/none
> 9: qmapmux0.0@wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>     link/[519]
> 
> Under this scenario, the downlink is completely broken (speedtest
> 0.39Mbps), while the uplink seems to work (speedtest 13Mbps).
> 
> If I use the logic I had before, associating the downlink data
> aggregation max size reported by the module to the MTU of the master
> interface, same as I had to do when using qmi_wwan add_mux/del_mux,
> then it works properly:
> 
> # ip link
> 14: wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 4096 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>     link/none
> 15: qmapmux0.0@wwp0s20f0u8u4i5: <UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
> state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>     link/[519]
> 
> Downlink is now 26Mbps and uplink still 13Mbps.
> 
> Is there something I'm doing wrong? Or do we really need to do the
> same thing as in qmi_wwan add_mux/del_mux; i.e. configuring the master
> interface MTU to be the same as the downlink max aggregation data size
> so that we change the rx_urb_size?

Unfortunately, this seems to be a limitation of qmi_wwan (usbnet)
where its tying the RX to the TX size through usbnet_change_mtu.

Ideally, we should break this dependency and have a sysfs or some other
configuration scheme to set the rx_urb_size.

Looks like this discussion has happened a while back and the option to 
use
a configurable scheme for rx_urb_size was rejected by Bjorn and Greg KH.
The summary of the thread was to set a large rx_urb_size during probe 
itself for qmi_wwan.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/patch/20200803065105.8997-1-yzc666@netease.com/

We could try setting a large value as suggested there and it should 
hopefully
solve the issue you are seeing.

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31 22:45 RMNET QMAP data aggregation with size greater than 16384 Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-05 19:10 ` subashab
2021-08-05 20:32   ` Aleksander Morgado
     [not found]     ` <CAGRyCJHYkH4_FvTzk7BFwjMN=iOTN_Y2=4ueY=s3rJMQO9j7uw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-08-05 21:01       ` Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-05 21:12         ` Daniele Palmas
2021-08-05 22:57     ` subashab
2021-08-06 14:08       ` Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-06 18:42         ` subashab [this message]
2021-08-06 19:58           ` Bjørn Mork
2021-08-06 20:22             ` Aleksander Morgado
2021-08-06 22:30               ` subashab
2021-08-07 10:55                 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-08-09 21:40                   ` subashab
2021-08-12 12:02                     ` Daniele Palmas
2021-08-13  6:21                       ` subashab
2021-08-13  6:25                         ` Bjørn Mork
2021-09-03 13:55                           ` Daniele Palmas
2021-09-08  6:21                             ` subashab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13972ac97ffe7a10fd85fe03dc84dc02@codeaurora.org \
    --to=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=aleksander@aleksander.es \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=dnlplm@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stranche@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.