From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix stall after CPU hotplugging
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:41:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397576515.752.5.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404151711250.22697@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
On wto, 2014-04-15 at 17:20 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > On wto, 2014-04-15 at 14:28 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 04/15/2014 11:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On pią, 2014-03-28 at 14:06 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >> Fix stall after hotplugging CPU1. Affected are SoCs where Multi Core Timer
> > > >> interrupts are shared (SPI), e.g. Exynos 4210. The stall was a result of
> > > >> starting the CPU1 local timer not in L1 timer but in L0 (which is used
> > > >> by CPU0).
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any comments on these 3 patches? They fix the CPU stall on
> > > > Exynos4210 and also on Exynos3250 (Chanwoo Choi sent patches for it
> > > > recently).
> > >
> > > You describe this issue as impacting different SoC not only the exynos,
> > > right ?
> > >
> > > Do you know what other SoCs are impacted by this ?
> >
> > No, affected are only Exynos SoC-s. It was confirmed on Exynos4210
> > (Trats board) and Exynos3250 (new SoC, patches for it were recently
> > posted by Chanwoo).
> >
> > Other Exynos SoC-s where MCT local timers use shared interrupts (SPI)
> > can also be affected. Candidates are Exynos 5250 and 5420 but I haven't
> > tested them.
> >
> > > I guess this issue is not reproducible just with the line below, we need
> > > a timer to expire right at the moment CPU1 is hotplugged, right ?
> >
> > Right. The timer must fire in short time between enabling local timer
> > for CPU1 and setting the affinity for IRQ.
>
> Why do you set the affinity in the CPU_ONLINE hotplug callback and not
> right away when the interrupt is requested?
Hi,
I think the problem in such code is in GIC. The gic_set_affinity() uses
cpu_online_mask:
unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
In that time this CPU is not present in that mask so -EINVAL would be
returned.
The stall occurred also on 3.10 where the IRQ affinity is set just after
setup_irq():
if (cpu == 0) {
mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = mevt;
evt->irq = mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ];
setup_irq(evt->irq, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
} else {
mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = mevt;
evt->irq = mct_irqs[MCT_L1_IRQ];
setup_irq(evt->irq, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
irq_set_affinity(evt->irq, cpumask_of(1));
}
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(str
> evt->irq);
> return -EIO;
> }
> + irq_set_affinity(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ + cpu], cpumask_of(cpu));
> } else {
> enable_percpu_irq(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ], 0);
> }
> @@ -461,12 +462,6 @@ static int exynos4_mct_cpu_notify(struct
> mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> exynos4_local_timer_setup(&mevt->evt);
> break;
> - case CPU_ONLINE:
> - cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> - if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI)
> - irq_set_affinity(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ + cpu],
> - cpumask_of(cpu));
> - break;
> case CPU_DYING:
> mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> exynos4_local_timer_stop(&mevt->evt);
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix stall after CPU hotplugging
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:41:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397576515.752.5.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404151711250.22697@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
On wto, 2014-04-15 at 17:20 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > On wto, 2014-04-15 at 14:28 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 04/15/2014 11:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On pi?, 2014-03-28 at 14:06 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >> Fix stall after hotplugging CPU1. Affected are SoCs where Multi Core Timer
> > > >> interrupts are shared (SPI), e.g. Exynos 4210. The stall was a result of
> > > >> starting the CPU1 local timer not in L1 timer but in L0 (which is used
> > > >> by CPU0).
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any comments on these 3 patches? They fix the CPU stall on
> > > > Exynos4210 and also on Exynos3250 (Chanwoo Choi sent patches for it
> > > > recently).
> > >
> > > You describe this issue as impacting different SoC not only the exynos,
> > > right ?
> > >
> > > Do you know what other SoCs are impacted by this ?
> >
> > No, affected are only Exynos SoC-s. It was confirmed on Exynos4210
> > (Trats board) and Exynos3250 (new SoC, patches for it were recently
> > posted by Chanwoo).
> >
> > Other Exynos SoC-s where MCT local timers use shared interrupts (SPI)
> > can also be affected. Candidates are Exynos 5250 and 5420 but I haven't
> > tested them.
> >
> > > I guess this issue is not reproducible just with the line below, we need
> > > a timer to expire right at the moment CPU1 is hotplugged, right ?
> >
> > Right. The timer must fire in short time between enabling local timer
> > for CPU1 and setting the affinity for IRQ.
>
> Why do you set the affinity in the CPU_ONLINE hotplug callback and not
> right away when the interrupt is requested?
Hi,
I think the problem in such code is in GIC. The gic_set_affinity() uses
cpu_online_mask:
unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
In that time this CPU is not present in that mask so -EINVAL would be
returned.
The stall occurred also on 3.10 where the IRQ affinity is set just after
setup_irq():
if (cpu == 0) {
mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = mevt;
evt->irq = mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ];
setup_irq(evt->irq, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
} else {
mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = mevt;
evt->irq = mct_irqs[MCT_L1_IRQ];
setup_irq(evt->irq, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
irq_set_affinity(evt->irq, cpumask_of(1));
}
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(str
> evt->irq);
> return -EIO;
> }
> + irq_set_affinity(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ + cpu], cpumask_of(cpu));
> } else {
> enable_percpu_irq(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ], 0);
> }
> @@ -461,12 +462,6 @@ static int exynos4_mct_cpu_notify(struct
> mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> exynos4_local_timer_setup(&mevt->evt);
> break;
> - case CPU_ONLINE:
> - cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> - if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI)
> - irq_set_affinity(mct_irqs[MCT_L0_IRQ + cpu],
> - cpumask_of(cpu));
> - break;
> case CPU_DYING:
> mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
> exynos4_local_timer_stop(&mevt->evt);
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 13:06 [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix stall after CPU hotplugging Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-03-28 13:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-03-28 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Change exynos4_mct_tick_clear return type to void Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-03-28 13:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-03-28 13:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix too early ISR fire up on wrong CPU Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-03-28 13:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-03-28 13:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-15 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix stall after CPU hotplugging Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-15 9:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-15 12:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-15 12:28 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-15 12:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-15 12:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-15 15:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 15:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 15:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2014-04-15 15:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-15 16:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 16:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-16 8:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-16 8:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-16 9:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-16 9:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397576515.752.5.camel@AMDC1943 \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.